Internal controls and SOX for enterprise buyers
Asked as “SOX compliance software”, and as “internal controls management tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 48 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
25%
Contested · MetricStream 21%
25AuditBoard21MetricStream12Workiva42others
25% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
AuditBoard vs HyperproofAuditBoard vs OptroAuditBoard vs WorkivaAuditBoard vs OnspringFloQast vs Diligent One PlatformFloQast vs LogicGate Risk CloudFloQast vs HyperproofFloQast vs OptroFloQast vs WorkivaFloQast vs OnspringDiligent One Platform vs LogicGate Risk CloudDiligent One Platform vs HyperproofDiligent One Platform vs OptroDiligent One Platform vs WorkivaDiligent One Platform vs OnspringLogicGate Risk Cloud vs HyperproofLogicGate Risk Cloud vs OptroLogicGate Risk Cloud vs WorkivaLogicGate Risk Cloud vs OnspringHyperproof vs OptroHyperproof vs WorkivaHyperproof vs OnspringOptro vs WorkivaOptro vs OnspringWorkiva vs Onspring
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05S06
07
08
09
10
11
12Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01AuditBoard25%
AuditBoard25%02MetricStream21%
MetricStream21%03Workiva12%
Workiva12%04Optro10%
Optro10%05ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management6%
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management6%06SAP GRC4%
07Archer4%
Archer4%08Pathlock2%
Pathlock2%09Diligent One Platform0%
Diligent One Platform0%10IBM OpenPages0%
IBM OpenPages0%11Oracle Risk Management and Compliance0%
Oracle Risk Management and Compliance0%12Vanta0%
Vanta0%What they warned about
Two of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Vanta54%
7 of 13 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid for Scale: Mid-market tools (FloQast ~$25K; Vanta/Drata ~$20-25K) lack enterprise depth” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
MetricStream11%
4 of 36 labels negative · 4 of 12 models
“Opaque pricing, 12-month implementation timeline... Not recommended unless you truly need the full GRC suite.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Microsoft Excel100%
3 of 3 labels negative · 3 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Spreadsheet‑Based “Control Registers” (Excel, Google Sheets, etc.) ... Avoid tools that are essentially spreadsheets” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Drata67%
6 of 9 labels negative · 3 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid for Scale: Mid-market tools (FloQast ~$25K; Vanta/Drata ~$20-25K) lack enterprise depth” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
62 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 978 links across 249 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Optro46 answers · 56 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Netwrix29 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
vendor site · HighRadius28 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
25 answers · 50 citations · 9 models
23 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Worldmetrics22 answers · 44 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Sprinto21 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · MetricStream19 answers · 26 citations · 8 models
vendor site · RiskWatch19 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
29 answers · 11 models
27 answers · 11 models
24 answers · 11 models
21 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 6 models
10 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best sox compliance software”, “internal controls tools”, “sox compliance software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AuditBoard auditboard.com | 25% | 87 | 8,100 | 220 | 129 | 0 | ||
| MetricStream metricstream.com | 21% | 87 | 1,000 | 35 | 94,301 | $211 | 8 | |
| Workiva workiva.com | 12% | 490 | 22,200 | 524 | 58,186 | $23 | 64 | 3 |
| Optro optro.ai | 10% | 54 | 2,900 | 39 | 126,117 | $4,599 | 75 | 4 |
| ServiceNow servicenow.com ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management 6% | 6% | 38 | 135,000 | 13,451 | 689,216 company | $673 | 101 | |
| SAP GRC | 4% | 880 | 236 | |||||
| Archer archerirm.com | 4% | 35 | 165,000 | 33,983 | 4,603 | 9 | ||
| BlackLine blackline.com BlackLine Controls & Certifications 4% | 4% | 28 | 27,100 | 1,255 | 28,740 company | $4,066 | 79 | |
| FloQast floqast.com | 4% | 389 | 9,900 | 194 | 41,324 | $5,039 | 76 | |
| Pathlock pathlock.com | 2% | 17 | 1,000 | 23 | 100,297 | $8,432 | 37 | 8 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartner.com, highradius.com, netwrix.com, optro.ai). The first result for “best sox compliance software” is zluri.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best SOX compliance software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which internal controls management tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade internal controls tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SOX compliance software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a SOX compliance software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which internal controls tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5BlackLine Controls & Certificationsno first choiceChangedAuditBoardBlackLine Controls & Certificationsno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Archer, Diligent One Platform, HighRadius, PathlockFour alternatives
Archer, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Arvexi, AuditBoardGPT-5.4 miniDiligent Internal Controls / AuditOptroChangedDiligent Internal Controls, Oracle Risk Management and Compliance, SAP GRC, SAP Process Control, Workivaagainst: Oracle Risk Management and ComplianceServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementno first choicenothing named
One alternative
SAI360Two alternatives
LogicManager, TeamMate ControlsOne alternative
WorkivaGemini 3.5 FlashOptroOptroHeldagainst: Drata, VantaOptroagainst: MetricStreamWorkivaOptro, Workivaagainst: Confluence, Drata, Jira, Microsoft Excel, Secureframe, SharePoint Lists, Vanta
Three alternatives
Pathlock, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaFive alternatives
HighRadius, MetricStream, Oracle Risk Management and Compliance, SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementFour alternatives
BlackLine Controls & Certifications, FloQast, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaThree alternatives
Optro, SmartSuite SOX Management, ZenGRCPerplexity SonarMetricStreamAuditBoardChangedAuditBoard, MetricStreamMetricStreamagainst: AuditBoard, Diligent One Platform, Onspring, Optro, Resolverno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
IBM OpenPages, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaThree alternatives
MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaFive alternatives
Diligent One Platform, IBM OpenPages, SAP GRC / SAP Audit Management, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaOne alternative
WorkivaGrok 4.20AuditBoardagainst: LogicGate Risk Cloud, OnspringAuditBoardHeldno first choiceagainst: Drata, VantaMetricStreamagainst: Drata, FloQast, Vantano first choiceagainst: Spreadsheets
Four alternatives
Diligent One Platform, MetricStream, SAP GRC, WorkivaThree alternatives
Archer, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementSeven alternatives
Archer, AuditBoard, Diligent One Platform, LogicGate Risk Cloud, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaThree alternatives
Optro, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaMistral SmallMetricStreamAuditBoardChangedMetricStreamWorkivaagainst: MetricStreamno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
AuditBoard, IBM OpenPagesOne alternative
ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementSeven alternatives
Archer, Diligent One Platform, Hyperproof, IBM OpenPages, LogicGate Risk Cloud, OneTrust GRC, SAP Audit ManagementOne alternative
Oracle Risk Management and ComplianceDeepSeek V4 FlashAuditBoard, Workivaagainst: FloQastAuditBoardChangedAuditBoardagainst: Sprinto, VantaOptroagainst: MetricStreamno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Diligent One Platform, MetricStream, Pathlock, SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementFour alternatives
Archer, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaSix alternatives
Archer, MetricStream, Pathlock, SAP Audit Management, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaThree alternatives
Onspring, SmartSuite SOX Management, WorkivaLlama 4 MaverickMetricStream, Pathlock, SAP GRCArcher, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementChangedno first choiceAuditBoard, MetricStream, Resolver, SAP GRCno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashMetricStreamAuditBoardChangedagainst: ArcherAuditBoardagainst: ArcherWorkivaAuditBoardagainst: AppSheet, Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel, Outlook, PowerApps, Slack, WhatsApp, iCloud
Four alternatives
Diligent Boards, Riskonnect, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Diligent One Platform, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementFive alternatives
Diligent One Platform, Drata, OneTrust GRC, SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementTwo alternatives
MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementFour alternatives
BlackLine Controls & Certifications, Diligent One Platform, Vena, WorkivaKimi K2AuditBoardMetricStreamChangedAuditBoardFloQastagainst: BlackLine Controls & Certificationsno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Diligent One Platform, MetricStream, WorkivaThree alternatives
SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaNine alternatives
Archer, Hyperproof, LogicGate Risk Cloud, MetricStream, Oracle Risk Management and Compliance, SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Vanta, WorkivaTwo alternatives
AuditBoard, WorkivaGLM 4.7 FlashXAuditBoard, WorkivaServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementChangedno first choiceOnspringagainst: MetricStreamno first choiceagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel
Five alternatives
BlackLine Controls & Certifications, Diligent One Platform, FloQast, Pathlock, SAP GRCThree alternatives
Archer, Diligent One Platform, WorkivaFour alternatives
AuditBoard, Drata, Hyperproof, VantaMiniMax M2.5AuditBoard, MetricStreamArcherChangedno first choiceagainst: Drata, VantaFloQastagainst: AuditBoard, BlackLine Controls & Certifications, Drata, Hyperproof, Vanta, Workivano first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Diligent One Platform, RiskWatchTwo alternatives
Hyperproof, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:57 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:27 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:57 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:26 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 17:58 | yes | 27 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 21:06 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 19:42 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:32 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 18:52 | yes | 8 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:09 | yes | 10 | 41 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:49 | yes | 20 | 105 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:37 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:03 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 19:52 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:48 | yes | 16 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:17 | yes | 17 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 18:35 | yes | 26 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 18:23 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:52 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:54 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 20:34 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:39 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:11 | yes | 26 | 60 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 19:55 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:40 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:29 | yes | 6 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 19:02 | yes | 9 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 21:00 | yes | 19 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 18:25 | yes | 33 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:14 | yes | 13 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 18:21 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:48 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:47 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 20:10 | yes | 25 | 60 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:17 | yes | 26 | 113 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:09 | yes | 12 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 20:39 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:03 | yes | 0 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 20:08 | yes | 26 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 18:11 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:09 | yes | 34 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 18:32 | yes | 22 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-09-17 18:32 | yes | 24 | 67 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:11 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:59 | yes | 10 | 49 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:21 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 19:54 | yes | 27 | 67 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 20:00 | yes | 16 | 47 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:31 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 18:25 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 20:00 | yes | 6 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:56 | yes | 20 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 19:18 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 20:43 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 18:16 | yes | 26 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 20:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:25 | no | 0 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 19:59 | yes | 13 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 20:03 | yes | 14 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 18:53 | no | 0 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 19:25 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 20:16 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 18:02 | yes | 21 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 19:51 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 21:03 | yes | 36 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 18:19 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 20:19 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 18:40 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 19:54 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 18:36 | yes | 24 | 61 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 18:44 | yes | 26 | 121 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 17:59 | yes | 5 | 57 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
BlackLine read as BlackLine Controls & Certifications
Diligent read as Diligent One Platform
Diligent (HighBond) read as Diligent One Platform
Diligent (formerly HighBond / OnControl) read as Diligent One Platform
Diligent (formerly HighBond/Diligent Boards) read as Diligent One Platform
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
IBM read as IBM OpenPages
LogicGate read as LogicGate Risk Cloud
Netwrix read as Netwrix Auditor
OneTrust read as OneTrust GRC
OneTrust (Risk Manager) read as OneTrust GRC
Oracle GRC read as Oracle Risk Management and Compliance
Oracle GRC Cloud read as Oracle Risk Management and Compliance
Oracle Risk Management read as Oracle Risk Management and Compliance
Oracle SOX Compliance Suite read as Oracle Risk Management and Compliance
Oracle legacy GRC / Enterprise Governance, Risk and Compliance read as Oracle Risk Management and Compliance
Oracle's SOX solutions read as Oracle Risk Management and Compliance
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
ServiceNow GRC read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
ServiceNow GRC (Integrated Risk Management) read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
SmartSuite read as SmartSuite SOX Management
Unresolved, counted raw
AppSheet
Bead AI
Deloitte's Compliance Dashboard
Diligent Internal Controls
Diligent Internal Controls / Audit
Outlook
PowerApps
SharePoint Lists
SoftComply
iCloud
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.