AML and transaction monitoring · November 2026 Edition
Unit21 vs Fraudio
Six of fourteen models named Unit21 first on the direct prompt; zero named Fraudio. Unit21 was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Fraudio by eight and Unit21 carries 40 labels and Fraudio 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share14%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#8A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels4010A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Unit21 reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ComplyAdvantage was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. ComplyAdvantage vs Unit21 · ComplyAdvantage vs Fraudio · Unit21 vs Flagright
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AML and transaction monitoring page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Unit21First choices, of fourteen modelsFraudio
Direct60
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained011 against Unit21
Scale-constrained10
Negative001 against Unit21
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Unit21 and Fraudio stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Unit21 Fraudio first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Unit21 on the left and Fraudio on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Unit21 and Fraudio stood in it.
Unit21 first, Fraudio not the choice
6 of 14 modelsFraudio was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniUnit21 alternatives: Feedzai, Fenergo, NICE Actimize
Gemini 3.5 FlashUnit21 alternatives: ComplyAdvantage, Hawk AI, Sumsub
Perplexity SonarUnit21 alternatives: ComplyAdvantage, Fraud.net, Hawk AI, Sanction Scanner
Mistral SmallComplyAdvantage, Flagright, Unit21 alternatives: Bureau ID
Kimi K2Flagright, Unit21 alternatives: ComplyAdvantage
GPT-6 LunaUnit21 alternatives: ComplyAdvantage, Sardine
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Grok 4.20ComplyAdvantage alternatives: Flagright, Fraudio, Sardine, Unit21
GLM 4.7 FlashXComplyAdvantage alternatives: AML Watcher, Flagright, Unit21
MiniMax M2.5ComplyAdvantage alternatives: Alessa, Flagright, FraudNet, Napier AI, Unit21
Muse Glimmer 30BComplyAdvantage alternatives: AMLYZE, Bureau ID, Flagright, Fraudio, SEON, Unit21
Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Alessa alternatives: ComplyAdvantage, Napier AI
DeepSeek V4 FlashAML Watcher, ComplyAdvantage alternatives: FraudNet, Napier AI
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashComplyAdvantage alternatives: AML Watcher, FICO Falcon Fraud Manager, NICE Actimize, VITAL4
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Unit214%#7 of 12Fraudio4%#8 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Unit214%#4 of 13Fraudio4%#– of 13What the models said about Unit21
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Strong transaction monitoring and case management, but may be more than a small company needs initially.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Unit21 (due to pricing transparency)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Modern RiskOps/API-first (Unit21, Flagright, ComplyAdvantage, AMLYZE, Salv): Faster to deploy, better UX, more suited to lean compliance teams” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Unit21 — Best for Configurable Operations & Built-in Case Management ... Industry standard for mid-market compliance workflow customization.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“ComplyAdvantage, Unit21, and Flagright are the top choices due to their modern architectures” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Fraudio
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“1. Fraudio — Best Overall for Payment Companies & Fintechs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Pay-per-use pricing with no setup or implementation fees, plus real-time fraud and AML monitoring.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · alternative
“If you need a usage-based model with no upfront costs, Fraudio is also a strong contender.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
ComplyAdvantage vs Unit21ComplyAdvantage vs FraudioUnit21 vs FlagrightUnit21 vs AML WatcherUnit21 vs Sanction ScannerUnit21 vs SumsubUnit21 vs AMLYZEFlagright vs FraudioAML Watcher vs FraudioSanction Scanner vs FraudioSumsub vs FraudioAMLYZE vs FraudioAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full AML monitoring standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.