AML and transaction monitoring · November 2026 Edition
Sumsub vs Fraudio
Zero of fourteen models named Sumsub first on the direct prompt; zero named Fraudio. Sumsub was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Fraudio by eight and Sumsub carries 25 labels and Fraudio 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#8A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels2510A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Sumsub reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ComplyAdvantage was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. ComplyAdvantage vs Sumsub · ComplyAdvantage vs Fraudio · Unit21 vs Sumsub
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AML and transaction monitoring page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SumsubFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFraudio
Direct00
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained01
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Sumsub
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Sumsub and Fraudio stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Sumsub Fraudio first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Sumsub on the left and Fraudio on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Sumsub and Fraudio stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashUnit21 alternatives: ComplyAdvantage, Hawk AI, Sumsub
Grok 4.20ComplyAdvantage alternatives: Flagright, Fraudio, Sardine, Unit21
Muse Glimmer 30BComplyAdvantage alternatives: AMLYZE, Bureau ID, Flagright, Fraudio, SEON, Unit21
Neither was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Alessa alternatives: ComplyAdvantage, Napier AI
GPT-5.4 miniUnit21 alternatives: Feedzai, Fenergo, NICE Actimize
Perplexity SonarUnit21 alternatives: ComplyAdvantage, Fraud.net, Hawk AI, Sanction Scanner
Mistral SmallComplyAdvantage, Flagright, Unit21 alternatives: Bureau ID
DeepSeek V4 FlashAML Watcher, ComplyAdvantage alternatives: FraudNet, Napier AI
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashComplyAdvantage alternatives: AML Watcher, FICO Falcon Fraud Manager, NICE Actimize, VITAL4
Kimi K2Flagright, Unit21 alternatives: ComplyAdvantage
GLM 4.7 FlashXComplyAdvantage alternatives: AML Watcher, Flagright, Unit21
MiniMax M2.5ComplyAdvantage alternatives: Alessa, Flagright, FraudNet, Napier AI, Unit21
GPT-6 LunaUnit21 alternatives: ComplyAdvantage, Sardine
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Sumsub2%#6 of 15Fraudio2%#8 of 15Enterprise
The order flips: Fraudio leads at enterprise.
Fraudio4%#– of 13Sumsub0%#– of 13What the models said about Sumsub
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Boutique/newer vendors with little regulatory track record... (e.g., Flagright, Rhizome, Sumsub)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“An 18-month undetected breach through a third-party support ticketing platform.” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Sumsub – *Best Overall for B2B Onboarding & KYB*” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you want one integrated onboarding platform rather than best-of-breed components, evaluate Sumsub as the simpler alternative.” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“More affordable, user-friendly options for KYC/AML with good API support... Sumsub stands out for its all-in-one verification” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · alternative
What the models said about Fraudio
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“1. Fraudio — Best Overall for Payment Companies & Fintechs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Pay-per-use pricing with no setup or implementation fees, plus real-time fraud and AML monitoring.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · alternative
“If you need a usage-based model with no upfront costs, Fraudio is also a strong contender.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
ComplyAdvantage vs SumsubComplyAdvantage vs FraudioUnit21 vs SumsubUnit21 vs FraudioFlagright vs SumsubFlagright vs FraudioAML Watcher vs SumsubAML Watcher vs FraudioSanction Scanner vs SumsubSanction Scanner vs FraudioSumsub vs AMLYZEAMLYZE vs FraudioAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full AML monitoring standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.