AML and transaction monitoring · November 2026 Edition
ComplyAdvantage vs Fraudio
Seven of fourteen models named ComplyAdvantage first on the direct prompt; zero named Fraudio. ComplyAdvantage was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Fraudio by eight and ComplyAdvantage carries 57 labels and Fraudio 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share39%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#8A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels5710A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ComplyAdvantage reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Unit21 was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. ComplyAdvantage vs Unit21 · ComplyAdvantage vs Flagright · ComplyAdvantage vs AML Watcher
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AML and transaction monitoring page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ComplyAdvantageFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFraudio
Direct70
Paraphrase80
Comparative10
Budget-constrained61
Scale-constrained10
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where ComplyAdvantage and Fraudio stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
ComplyAdvantage Fraudio first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ComplyAdvantage on the left and Fraudio on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ComplyAdvantage and Fraudio stood in it.
ComplyAdvantage first, Fraudio an alternative
7 of 14 modelsFraudio was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Grok 4.20ComplyAdvantage alternatives: Flagright, Fraudio, Sardine, Unit21
Mistral SmallComplyAdvantage, Flagright, Unit21 alternatives: Bureau ID
DeepSeek V4 FlashAML Watcher, ComplyAdvantage alternatives: FraudNet, Napier AI
Qwen 3.7 FlashComplyAdvantage alternatives: AML Watcher, FICO Falcon Fraud Manager, NICE Actimize, VITAL4
GLM 4.7 FlashXComplyAdvantage alternatives: AML Watcher, Flagright, Unit21
MiniMax M2.5ComplyAdvantage alternatives: Alessa, Flagright, FraudNet, Napier AI, Unit21
Muse Glimmer 30BComplyAdvantage alternatives: AMLYZE, Bureau ID, Flagright, Fraudio, SEON, Unit21
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Alessa alternatives: ComplyAdvantage, Napier AI
Gemini 3.5 FlashUnit21 alternatives: ComplyAdvantage, Hawk AI, Sumsub
Perplexity SonarUnit21 alternatives: ComplyAdvantage, Fraud.net, Hawk AI, Sanction Scanner
Kimi K2Flagright, Unit21 alternatives: ComplyAdvantage
GPT-6 LunaUnit21 alternatives: ComplyAdvantage, Sardine
Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniUnit21 alternatives: Feedzai, Fenergo, NICE Actimize
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
ComplyAdvantage leads by twenty-five points.
ComplyAdvantage29%#1 of 12Fraudio4%#8 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
ComplyAdvantage leads by thirty-eight points.
ComplyAdvantage39%#1 of 15Fraudio2%#8 of 15Enterprise
ComplyAdvantage leads by thirteen points.
ComplyAdvantage17%#2 of 13Fraudio4%#– of 13What the models said about ComplyAdvantage
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“If I had to pick a starting point for a typical mid-sized B2B company, I'd shortlist ComplyAdvantage for sanctions, PEP, and adverse-media screening with ongoing monitoring.” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“start by requesting demos from Sumsub (for end-to-end legal entity onboarding) and ComplyAdvantage (for industry-leading risk database screening)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“ComplyAdvantage and LexisNexis Risk Solutions are often recommended for their balance of advanced features, ease of use, and scalability” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Fraudio
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“1. Fraudio — Best Overall for Payment Companies & Fintechs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Pay-per-use pricing with no setup or implementation fees, plus real-time fraud and AML monitoring.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · alternative
“If you need a usage-based model with no upfront costs, Fraudio is also a strong contender.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
ComplyAdvantage vs Unit21ComplyAdvantage vs FlagrightComplyAdvantage vs AML WatcherComplyAdvantage vs Sanction ScannerComplyAdvantage vs SumsubComplyAdvantage vs AMLYZEUnit21 vs FraudioFlagright vs FraudioAML Watcher vs FraudioSanction Scanner vs FraudioSumsub vs FraudioAMLYZE vs FraudioAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full AML monitoring standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.