Index › Finance › Planning and analysis › Corporate performance ma › Jedox vs Datarails
Corporate performance management · November 2026 Edition

Jedox vs Datarails

Zero of fourteen models named Jedox first on the direct prompt; zero named Datarails. Jedox was named by seven of the fourteen models and Datarails by eight and Jedox carries 10 labels and Datarails 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Jedox

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

Datarails

criticized challenger

Named in ten categories this edition.

First-choice share6%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate10%25%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels1012A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Jedox reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Planful was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Planful vs Jedox · Planful vs Datarails · Vena vs Jedox

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the corporate performance management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
JedoxFirst choices, of fourteen modelsDatarails
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative001 against Datarails
Budget-constrained32
Scale-constrained001 against Datarails
Negative001 against Jedox · 1 against Datarails
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Jedox and Datarails stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Jedox Datarails first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Jedox on the left and Datarails on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Jedox and Datarails stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
DeepSeek V4 FlashPlanful alternatives: Datarails, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Kimi K2Cube, Vena alternatives: Datarails, Planful, Prophix

Neither was named

12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Prophix
Gemini 3.5 FlashPigment alternatives: Cube, Mosaic, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Perplexity SonarPlanful alternatives: Drivetrain, Pigment, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Grok 4.20Planful alternatives: Drivetrain, OneStream, Prophix
Mistral SmallAnaplan, Empower alternatives: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Anaplan, Cube, OneStream, Planful
GLM 4.7 FlashXPlanful, Vena alternatives: Board, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planning
MiniMax M2.5Vena alternatives: OneStream, Pigment, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning
GPT-6 LunaPlanful alternatives: Pigment, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Muse Glimmer 30BPlanful, Vena alternatives: Prophix, deFacto Global

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Datarails leads by three points.
Datarails5%#5 of 14
Jedox2%#– of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Jedox leads at mid-market.
Jedox6%#6 of 16
Datarails4%#7 of 16
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Jedox0%#– of 13
Datarails0%#– of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Jedox

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Perform especially rigorous reference checks, security reviews, roadmap validation, and integration testing.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Jedox is the strongest EPM shortlist candidate” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“🥇 Top Pick: Jedox (~$160–$500/user/year)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“the best EPM choice is usually Jedox” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Datarails

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Choose tools like Cube, Datarails, or Centage, which can be configured internally or with minimal vendor onboarding support.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.