Index › Finance › Planning and analysis › Board › BoardPro vs Zeck
Board and investor reporting · November 2026 Edition

BoardPro vs Zeck

One of fourteen models named BoardPro first on the direct prompt; one named Zeck. BoardPro was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Zeck by six and BoardPro carries 27 labels and Zeck 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

BoardPro

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Zeck

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share7%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels2710A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, BoardPro reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.OnBoard was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. OnBoard vs BoardPro · OnBoard vs Zeck · Boardable vs BoardPro

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board and investor reporting page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
BoardProFirst choices, of fourteen modelsZeck
Direct111 against BoardPro
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained301 against BoardPro
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where BoardPro and Zeck stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
BoardPro Zeck first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, BoardPro on the left and Zeck on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where BoardPro and Zeck stood in it.

BoardPro first, Zeck not the choice

1 of 14 modelsZeck was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Kimi K2AppDeck Board Portal, BoardPro alternatives: Board Intelligence, OnBoard

Zeck first, BoardPro not the choice

1 of 14 modelsBoardPro was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashMosaic, OnBoard, Zeck alternatives: Cube, Datarails, Govenda

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
DeepSeek V4 FlashOnBoard alternatives: BoardPro, Ideals Board
Qwen 3.7 FlashFairview alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, BoardPro, OnBoard, Zeck
GLM 4.7 FlashXAppDeck Board Portal alternatives: BoardPro, Fathom, OnBoard

Neither was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5OnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, Govenda
GPT-5.4 miniBoard Intelligence, OnBoard alternatives: Diligent Boards, Nasdaq Boardvantage
Perplexity SonarOnBoard alternatives: Fairview, Planful, Prophix
Grok 4.20OnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, Boardable
Mistral SmallFairview alternatives: Azeus Convene, Mosaic
Llama 4 MaverickFairview alternatives: BoardEffect, Mosaic, OnBoard
MiniMax M2.5Fairview alternatives: Aleph, Mosaic
GPT-6 LunaOnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, Boardable
Muse Glimmer 30BOnBoard alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, BoardEffect, Diligent Boards

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
BoardPro leads by twenty-four points.
BoardPro27%#1 of 12
Zeck2%#– of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
BoardPro leads by five points.
BoardPro7%#4 of 13
Zeck2%#6 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
BoardPro leads by six points.
BoardPro6%#– of 12
Zeck0%#– of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about BoardPro

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Choose BoardPro only if budget and simplicity matter more than deeper governance controls” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · soft negative
“Tailored for SMEs, but the flat fee might not suit the smallest budgets.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative

What the models said about Zeck

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Go with Zeck (for a modern web-first deck with engagement tracking)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Look for intuitive, secure modern Board Portals (e.g., OnBoard, Board Intelligence, Zeck, Diligent, Admincontrol)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.