Financial consolidation · November 2026 Edition
Prophix vs Sage Intacct
Eleven of fourteen models named Prophix first on the direct prompt; zero named Sage Intacct. Both were named by all fourteen models and Prophix carries 41 labels and Sage Intacct 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Named in twenty categories this edition.
First-choice share31%11%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate2%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels4121A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Prophix reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Planful was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Prophix vs Joiin · Prophix vs Planful · Prophix vs Vena
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the financial consolidation page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ProphixFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSage Intacct
Direct110
Paraphrase46
Comparative00
Budget-constrained001 against Prophix
Scale-constrained20
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Prophix and Sage Intacct stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Prophix Sage Intacct first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Prophix on the left and Sage Intacct on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Prophix and Sage Intacct stood in it.
Prophix first, Sage Intacct an alternative
11 of 14 modelsSage Intacct was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashProphix alternatives: Fluence Technologies, Planful, Vena
Grok 4.20Planful, Prophix alternatives: Vena
Mistral SmallPlanful, Prophix alternatives: OneStream, Vena
DeepSeek V4 FlashProphix alternatives: Planful, Vena
Llama 4 MaverickProphix alternatives: CCH Tagetik, OneStream, Planful
Qwen 3.7 FlashPlanful, Prophix alternatives: Datarails, Vena
Kimi K2Prophix alternatives: Planful, Sage Intacct, Vena
GLM 4.7 FlashXProphix alternatives: OneStream, Planful
MiniMax M2.5Prophix, Vena alternatives: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, Workiva
GPT-6 LunaProphix alternatives: Planful
Muse Glimmer 30BPlanful, Prophix alternatives: Datarails, OneStream, Vena
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Planful alternatives: Datarails, Prophix, Sage Intacct
GPT-5.4 miniOneStream alternatives: BlackLine, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Prophix, Vena
Perplexity SonarPlanful alternatives: Datarails, OneStream, Prophix, Vena
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Sage Intacct leads by five points.
Sage Intacct7%#3 of 14Prophix2%#10 of 14Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Prophix leads at mid-market.
Prophix31%#1 of 14Sage Intacct11%#4 of 14Enterprise
What the models said about Prophix
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Enterprise solutions like Oracle Cloud EPM, OneStream, or Prophix start in the $24,000–$50,000+/year range, making them disproportionate” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“If you need a quick, cost-effective, Excel-friendly solution → Vena or Prophix One (both have strong mid-market momentum and are known for rapid deployment).” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Prophix One (Best Overall Value) ... Prophix leads the mid-market because it bundles consolidation, close management, and planning into one platform” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Prophix: Strong for consolidation + FP&A; good for multi-entity, automation, and reporting. User-friendly for mid-size.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
What the models said about Sage Intacct
No label in this category carried a quote.
Also compared
Prophix vs JoiinProphix vs PlanfulProphix vs VenaProphix vs OneStreamProphix vs Oracle NetSuiteProphix vs DatarailsJoiin vs Sage IntacctPlanful vs Sage IntacctSage Intacct vs VenaSage Intacct vs OneStreamSage Intacct vs Oracle NetSuiteSage Intacct vs DatarailsAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full financial consolidation standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.