Index › Finance › Accounting and close › Financial consolidation › Prophix vs Planful
Financial consolidation · November 2026 Edition

Prophix vs Planful

Eleven of fourteen models named Prophix first on the direct prompt; six named Planful. Both were named by all fourteen models and Prophix carries 41 labels and Planful 39, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Prophix

endorsed leader

Named in eight categories this edition.

Planful

accepted challenger

Named in ten categories this edition.

First-choice share31%17%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate2%5%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#3A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels4139A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Prophix reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Vena was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Prophix vs Joiin · Prophix vs Sage Intacct · Prophix vs Vena

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the financial consolidation page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ProphixFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPlanful
Direct116
Paraphrase42
Comparative00
Budget-constrained001 against Prophix · 2 against Planful
Scale-constrained21
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Prophix and Planful were named in the same answer 158 times, of the 262 answers naming Prophix and the 402 naming Planful. In those answers Planful took the first choice fourteen times and Prophix twenty.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Prophix and Planful stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Prophix Planful first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Prophix on the left and Planful on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Prophix and Planful stood in it.

Both were the first choice

4 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
Grok 4.20Planful, Prophix alternatives: Vena
Mistral SmallPlanful, Prophix alternatives: OneStream, Vena
Qwen 3.7 FlashPlanful, Prophix alternatives: Datarails, Vena
Muse Glimmer 30BPlanful, Prophix alternatives: Datarails, OneStream, Vena

Prophix first, Planful an alternative

7 of 14 modelsPlanful was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashProphix alternatives: Fluence Technologies, Planful, Vena
DeepSeek V4 FlashProphix alternatives: Planful, Vena
Llama 4 MaverickProphix alternatives: CCH Tagetik, OneStream, Planful
Kimi K2Prophix alternatives: Planful, Sage Intacct, Vena
GLM 4.7 FlashXProphix alternatives: OneStream, Planful
MiniMax M2.5Prophix, Vena alternatives: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, Workiva
GPT-6 LunaProphix alternatives: Planful

Planful first, Prophix an alternative

2 of 14 modelsProphix was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Planful alternatives: Datarails, Prophix, Sage Intacct
Perplexity SonarPlanful alternatives: Datarails, OneStream, Prophix, Vena

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniOneStream alternatives: BlackLine, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Prophix, Vena

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Prophix2%#10 of 14
Planful2%#11 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Prophix leads by fifteen points.
Prophix31%#1 of 14
Planful17%#3 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Prophix leads by two points.
Prophix2%#5 of 13
Planful0%#8 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Prophix

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Enterprise solutions like Oracle Cloud EPM, OneStream, or Prophix start in the $24,000–$50,000+/year range, making them disproportionate” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“If you need a quick, cost-effective, Excel-friendly solution → Vena or Prophix One (both have strong mid-market momentum and are known for rapid deployment).” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Prophix One (Best Overall Value) ... Prophix leads the mid-market because it bundles consolidation, close management, and planning into one platform” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Prophix: Strong for consolidation + FP&A; good for multi-entity, automation, and reporting. User-friendly for mid-size.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about Planful

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Mid-Market Dedicated CPM / Consolidation Tools: Planful, Prophix, Vena Solutions, Fluence Technologies, LucaNet. (Great balance of powerful consolidation logic, fast implementation, and finance-team maintenance).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.