RackTables
Why models recommend it
“Best No-Frills / Lightweight Tool: RackTables”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Budget-constrained question · alternative
What gives them pause
“high negative share (33% negative labels) and is generally not recommended for most use cases”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“It has a high negative rate of 33% and is considered a criticized challenger.”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
“RackTables, in particular, is sometimes criticized for its rigid structure that makes customizing beyond basic asset tracking difficult”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
“It's simpler but less actively maintained than NetBox or openDCIM—good for very small setups but not as feature-rich.”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as RackTables, over the 31 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 | 6 | View → | |
| 24 | 14 | View → | |
| 19 | 0 | View → | |
| 17 | 2 | View → | |
| 14 | 0 | View → | |
| 14 | 0 | View → | |
| 12 | 0 | View → | |
| 8 | 1 | View → | |
| 8 | 1 | View → | |
| 8 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of RackTables →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 30 of the 31 answers that named RackTables and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
No domain is on file for RackTables, so its own site is not marked. Fifteen were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |