OPSWAT MetaAccess
Named, too few times to rank.
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share is stated. OPSWAT MetaAccess has 8.
Why models recommend it
“Portnox and OPSWAT MetaAccess are the top picks”Mistral Small · Direct question · first choice
“Go with Portnox Cloud or OPSWAT MetaAccess.”MiniMax M2.5 · Paraphrase question · first choice
“if your company has specific needs like heavy endpoint management integration, OPSWAT MetaAccess might be a better fit”MiniMax M2.5 · Direct question · alternative
“OPSWAT MetaAccess is the pick for "Mid-market wanting cloud simplicity" with a 7.9 score”Muse Glimmer 30B · Paraphrase question · alternative
What gives them pause
No model argued against it.
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as OPSWAT MetaAccess, over the 20 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 11 | View → | |
| 13 | 3 | View → | |
| 10 | 0 | View → | |
| 10 | 0 | View → | |
| 9 | 0 | View → | |
| 9 | 0 | View → | |
| 8 | 0 | View → | |
| 7 | 2 | View → | |
| 7 | 0 | View → | |
| 4 | 0 | View → |
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 20 of the 20 answers that named OPSWAT MetaAccess and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
No domain is on file for OPSWAT MetaAccess, so its own site is not marked. Ten were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |