Gane Index

All indexesEvery index and its categories GTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations software ITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data software HRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning software FinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software

Claim your listing

Index › IT › Products › Caldera · November 2026 Edition

Breach and attack simulation · Named, not ranked

Caldera

–Too few to rank

3/14Models named it

0First choices

0Warnings

November 2026 Edition · all company sizes counted.

Ranked inBreach and attack simulation #35 mid-market

What AI models recommend

Named, too few times to rank.

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share is stated. Caldera has 1.

Why models recommend it

“Caldera (MITRE-developed, highly customizable)”Kimi K2 · Negative question · alternative

What gives them pause

No model argued against it.

Also on the shortlist

The products named in the same answers as Caldera, over the 6 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.

Product	Named together	Picked instead
Cymulate	5	1	View →
Picus Security Validation Platform	5	0	View →
Infection Monkey	3	1	View →
Atomic Red Team	3	0	View →
SafeBreach	3	0	View →
AttackIQ Flex	2	2	View →
AttackIQ	2	0	View →
Horizon3.ai NodeZero	1	1	View →
ART	1	0	View →
AvalonX	1	0	View →

A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.

How this is measured

Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.

Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.

Read the method →

Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages the answers that named Caldera came back with. A fact about retrieval, not a cause of the answer.

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Caldera and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

picussecurity.com5

attackiq.com4

cymulate.com4

startupstash.com4

g2.com3

github.com3

reddit.com3

safebreach.com3

techtarget.com3

atomicredteam.io2

No domain is on file for Caldera, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

startupstash.com/best-breach-and-attack-simulation-tools4

g2.com/categories/breach-and-attack-simulation-bas3

reddit.com/r/cybersecurity/comments/1bdi6ou/breach_attack_simulation_bas3

techtarget.com/news/Pros-and-cons-of-7-breach-and-attack-simulation-tools/8372683

atomicredteam.io/2

attackiq.com/products/flex2

bcs365.com/insights/breach-and-attack-simulation-pricing2

comparitech.com/net-admin/best-bas-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

By model

How each model answered on Caldera across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0