BIND
Named, too few times to rank.
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share is stated. BIND has 6.
Why models recommend it
“For smaller environments, consider Open Source options (BIND/Kea)”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · alternative
“free tools like BIND (DNS) and Kea (DHCP from ISC)”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Pure open-source (BIND, ISC DHCP, Microsoft DNS/DHCP alone) ... Why to avoid: These don't scale reliably”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Negative question · warning
“Avoid pure DIY approaches (spreadsheets + BIND/Windows DNS) for anything beyond very small networks”Kimi K2 · Negative question · warning
“cost nothing extra but limited enterprise features”Kimi K2 · Comparative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as BIND, over the 17 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 1 | View → | |
| 12 | 1 | View → | |
| 11 | 0 | View → | |
| 9 | 0 | View → | |
| 7 | 1 | View → | |
| 5 | 2 | View → | |
| 5 | 1 | View → | |
| 4 | 0 | View → | |
| 4 | 0 | View → | |
| 3 | 1 | View → |
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 16 of the 17 answers that named BIND and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
No domain is on file for BIND, so its own site is not marked. Eight were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |