Amazon Textract is a fully managed machine learning service from AWS that extracts text, handwriting, tables and form data from documents · amazon.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Nanonets is first at 42%.
Nanonets is first at 31%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
ABBYY Vantage is first at 38%.
“"I have a developer" | Amazon Textract or Google Document AI | Rawest price per page ($0.0015). No markup.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Amazon Textract is often the safest budget-conscious choice for teams that want a scalable IDP foundation”GPT-5.4 mini · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Developers usually prefer AWS Textract or Azure AI Document Intelligence APIs to integrate into custom apps”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Cloud APIs like Azure Document Intelligence, Amazon Textract, Google Document AI, or Mistral OCR”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“Avoid if you do not have a dedicated DevOps team to maintain the code.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Amazon Textract as a standalone, turnkey IDP platform. Treat it as a document-processing building block: you may need to add workflow orchestration, validation, and exception handling yourself.”GPT-6 Luna · Negative question · warning
“Google Document AI, Amazon Textract, and Azure Document Intelligence can provide strong extraction, but you may need to build validation, exception queues... They are risky choices”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“zero out-of-the-box user interface or business workflow. Your team must build the exception-handling UI, ERP integrations, and business logic manually.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Direct question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Amazon Textract, over the 89 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 66 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 65 | 16 | Compare → | |
| 56 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 50 | 23 | Compare → | |
| 47 | 7 | View → | |
| 44 | 0 | View → | |
| 36 | 16 | Compare → | |
| 22 | 1 | View → | |
| 20 | 8 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of Amazon Textract →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Amazon Textract's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 79 of the 89 answers that named Amazon Textract and are not a share of its labels.
190 of the 190 domain citations in answers naming Amazon Textract came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |