Extended detection and response · November 2026 Edition
ESET PROTECT vs Bitdefender GravityZone XDR
Zero of fourteen models named ESET PROTECT first on the direct prompt; one named Bitdefender GravityZone XDR. ESET PROTECT was named by seven of the fourteen models and Bitdefender GravityZone XDR by eight and ESET PROTECT carries 11 labels and Bitdefender GravityZone XDR 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share5%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1117A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ESET PROTECT reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Defender XDR vs ESET PROTECT · Microsoft Defender XDR vs Bitdefender GravityZone XDR · CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR vs ESET PROTECT
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the extended detection and response page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ESET PROTECTFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBitdefender GravityZone XDR
Direct01
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained30
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where ESET PROTECT and Bitdefender GravityZone XDR stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
ESET PROTECT Bitdefender GravityZone XDR first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ESET PROTECT on the left and Bitdefender GravityZone XDR on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ESET PROTECT and Bitdefender GravityZone XDR stood in it.
Bitdefender GravityZone XDR first, ESET PROTECT an alternative
1 of 14 modelsESET PROTECT was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Muse Glimmer 30BBitdefender GravityZone XDR, Stellar Cyber Open XDR alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR, Cynet 360 AutoXDR, ESET PROTECT, Microsoft Defender XDR, Ontinue, SentinelOne Singularity, Sophos Intercept X, WithSecure Elements
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GLM 4.7 FlashXCrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, SentinelOne Singularity
MiniMax M2.5CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR, Microsoft Defender XDR alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, SentinelOne Singularity
Neither was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Sophos Intercept X alternatives: Microsoft Defender XDR, SentinelOne Singularity, Stellar Cyber Open XDR
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Defender XDR alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, SentinelOne Singularity
Gemini 3.5 FlashSentinelOne Singularity, Sophos Intercept X, Sophos MDR alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR, Microsoft Defender XDR, Trend Vision One
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Defender XDR alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, SentinelOne Singularity, Sophos Intercept X, Sophos MDR, Stellar Cyber Open XDR
Grok 4.20CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR, Microsoft Defender XDR alternatives: Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, SentinelOne Singularity, Sophos Intercept X
Mistral SmallCrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR, Sophos Intercept X alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint with E5 License, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
DeepSeek V4 FlashSophos Intercept X alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR, Cynet 360 AutoXDR, Microsoft Defender XDR, SentinelOne Singularity
Llama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Defender XDR alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR, Sophos Intercept X, Stellar Cyber Open XDR
Qwen 3.7 FlashStellar Cyber Open XDR alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR, Microsoft Defender XDR, SentinelOne Singularity
Kimi K2Microsoft Defender XDR alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR, SentinelOne Singularity
GPT-6 LunaCrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR, Microsoft Defender XDR alternatives: Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, SentinelOne Singularity
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Bitdefender GravityZone XDR leads by two points.
Bitdefender GravityZone XDR2%#6 of 12ESET PROTECT0%#9 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: ESET PROTECT leads at mid-market.
ESET PROTECT5%#5 of 12Bitdefender GravityZone XDR2%#7 of 12Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
ESET PROTECT0%#– of 10Bitdefender GravityZone XDR0%#7 of 10What the models said about ESET PROTECT
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“The best XDR platform for a company with a limited budget is ESET, as it is considered the best low-cost XDR solution.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Highlighted as the best low-cost XDR solution, making it a strong choice for budget-conscious organizations.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“1. ESET PROTECT Premium Plus ⭐ Best Overall Budget Choice” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Bitdefender GravityZone XDR
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Best value overall: Bitdefender — competent managed XDR at pricing that mid-market organizations can approve” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“managed XDR services, such as Bitdefender, which offers competent managed XDR at a price that mid-market organizations can approve” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · alternative
“Best For – Organizations looking for a cost-effective, all-in-one solution that provides strong ransomware protection” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared
Microsoft Defender XDR vs ESET PROTECTMicrosoft Defender XDR vs Bitdefender GravityZone XDRCrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR vs ESET PROTECTCrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR vs Bitdefender GravityZone XDRSophos Intercept X vs ESET PROTECTSophos Intercept X vs Bitdefender GravityZone XDRSentinelOne Singularity vs ESET PROTECTSentinelOne Singularity vs Bitdefender GravityZone XDRESET PROTECT vs Stellar Cyber Open XDRStellar Cyber Open XDR vs Bitdefender GravityZone XDRAll twenty-one head-to-head pages and the full XDR standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.