Zero of fourteen models named Firefox for Enterprise first on the direct prompt; zero named Prisma Access Browser. Firefox for Enterprise was named by nine of the fourteen models and Prisma Access Browser by eleven and Firefox for Enterprise carries 19 labels and Prisma Access Browser 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the enterprise browsers page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Firefox for Enterprise and Prisma Access Browser were named in the same answer twelve times, of the 52 answers naming Firefox for Enterprise and the 62 naming Prisma Access Browser. In those answers Prisma Access Browser took the first choice zero times and Firefox for Enterprise one.
| Model | DirectFFPA | ParaphraseFFPA | ComparativeFFPA | Budget-constrainedFFPA | Scale-constrainedFFPA | NegativeFFPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | FF | FF | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | PA | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | PA | FF | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | PA | PA | FF | FF | ||
| Grok 4.20 | PA | |||||
| Mistral Small | PA | FF | FF | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | PA | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | PA | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | FF | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | FF | FF | FF | FF | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | PA | FFPA | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | FF | FF |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid or be cautious with Brave and Firefox ESR for enterprise use.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Brave, Tor, and standard Firefox can improve privacy, but privacy features do not substitute for corporate DLP, identity controls, auditing, or session-level policy enforcement.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“smaller ecosystem and fewer pre-built integrations than Chrome or Edge” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Mozilla is positioning this as a sovereignty-focused alternative—deployable on-premises, with customer-controlled data and policies” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
“Firefox for Enterprise (free) provide solid security without additional cost” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“For absolute zero spend and privacy focus, Firefox for Enterprise can be managed centrally for free, though you will need third-party add-ons” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · alternative
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“they can introduce latency/friction and are better as a complement rather than primary browser for daily B2B work” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious with - Smaller or newer "secure enterprise browser" products—including Island or Prisma Browser” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“look at dedicated browsers like Island or Prisma Access Browser — but test with a 25–50 user pilot first” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Another dedicated enterprise browser, built on Chromium, with built-in security features like DLP, identity management, and session controls.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · alternative
“Prisma Browser is strongest in organizations already invested in Palo Alto Networks’ security stack” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.