Index › IT › Security operations › EDR › Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
Endpoint detection and response · November 2026 Edition

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Bitdefender GravityZone EDR

Zero of fourteen models named Microsoft Defender for Cloud first on the direct prompt; one named Bitdefender GravityZone EDR. Microsoft Defender for Cloud was named by nine of the fourteen models and Bitdefender GravityZone EDR by twelve and Microsoft Defender for Cloud carries 12 labels and Bitdefender GravityZone EDR 29, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

accepted challenger

Named in fifteen categories this edition.

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share18%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%14%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#7A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels1229A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Microsoft Defender for Cloud reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Defender for Endpoint was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud · Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Bitdefender GravityZone EDR · Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs SentinelOne Singularity

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the endpoint detection and response page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Microsoft Defender for CloudFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBitdefender GravityZone EDR
Direct011 against Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained901 against Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Bitdefender GravityZone EDR stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Bitdefender GravityZone EDR first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Microsoft Defender for Cloud on the left and Bitdefender GravityZone EDR on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Bitdefender GravityZone EDR stood in it.

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR first, Microsoft Defender for Cloud not the choice

1 of 14 modelsMicrosoft Defender for Cloud was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallBitdefender GravityZone EDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Insight, Seceon aiXDR-PMax, Sophos Intercept X

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarHuntress Managed EDR alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Insight, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity, Sophos MDR
Grok 4.20CrowdStrike Falcon Insight, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, Sophos Intercept X
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint, Sophos Intercept X alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Insight, SentinelOne Singularity
Muse Glimmer 30BCrowdStrike Falcon Insight alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Seceon aiXDR-PMax, SentinelOne Singularity

Neither was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Insight, SentinelOne Singularity, Sophos Intercept X
Gemini 3.5 FlashCrowdStrike, SentinelOne Singularity alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Sophos Intercept X
DeepSeek V4 FlashHuntress Managed EDR alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Insight, ESET PROTECT, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity
Llama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Insight, Seceon aiXDR-PMax, Sophos Intercept X
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: SentinelOne Singularity, Sophos Intercept X
Kimi K2Microsoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Insight, Huntress Managed EDR, SentinelOne Singularity
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Seceon aiXDR-PMax alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Insight, SentinelOne Singularity, Sophos Intercept X
GPT-6 LunaCrowdStrike Falcon with Falcon Complete MDR alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Microsoft Defender for Cloud leads by fifty-six points.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud56%#1 of 8
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR0%#5 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Microsoft Defender for Cloud leads by sixteen points.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud18%#2 of 10
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR2%#7 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is not named for this buyer.
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR2%#5 of 10
Microsoft Defender for Cloud—not named
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“For small businesses, Microsoft Defender for Business is a strong baseline, especially if they are already using Microsoft 365 Business Premium, as it is included at no extra cost.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Value (If already using Microsoft 365)... Upgrading to M365 Business Premium or licensing Defender for Business is almost always the most cost-effective path.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Bitdefender GravityZone EDR

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“GravityZone scored only 59% detection accuracy (the lowest of products tested)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Bitdefender GravityZone showed lower detection accuracy (59%) compared to other leading solutions” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Good for very basic needs but lighter on advanced response compared to the above.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Bitdefender GravityZone EDR are top choices” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“For mid‑market and SMBs focused on value and simplicity, Bitdefender ... provide strong detection and response” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · alternative
“A compelling value option when strong prevention, broad platform coverage, and accessible mid-market pricing matter.” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.