Six of fourteen models named Microsoft Defender for Office 365 first on the direct prompt; three named Abnormal AI. Both were named by all fourteen models and Microsoft Defender for Office 365 carries 63 labels and Abnormal AI 43, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the email security page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 and Abnormal AI were named in the same answer ninety-eight times, of the 193 answers naming Microsoft Defender for Office 365 and the 117 naming Abnormal AI. In those answers Abnormal AI took the first choice sixteen times and Microsoft Defender for Office 365 thirty.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Microsoft 365 users experience 3x more email-related incidents than Google Workspace users” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Good value, but many orgs find native M365 needs supplementing.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“Integrated cloud-native solutions: Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Google Workspace security (native integration, no MX changes)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
“Best for Microsoft 365 Users: Microsoft Defender for Office 365 (Plan 1) ... often the cheapest path to enterprise-grade features” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“If I had to pick one default answer: Microsoft Defender for Office 365 if you're Microsoft-centric and want the least friction.” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid for Budget Scenarios - Abnormal Security - ... pricing starts at $25,000/year” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Abnormal Security — powerful but requires expensive add-ons” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“without the complexity or high costs of tools like Abnormal Security (which starts at $25K+/year)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Add Abnormal AI (or an equivalent AI-based layer) to catch the sophisticated BEC and social engineering threats that generic gateways miss” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Consider modern platforms like Abnormal Security, Material Security, or Microsoft Defender for Office 365” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“My default pick: Abnormal AI for a mid-market B2B company using Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.