Data security posture management · November 2026 Edition
Microsoft Purview vs Securiti
Two of fourteen models named Microsoft Purview first on the direct prompt; zero named Securiti. Both were named by all fourteen models and Microsoft Purview carries 37 labels and Securiti 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in eleven categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share25%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%5%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#7A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels3722A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Microsoft Purview reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Cyera was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Purview vs Cyera · Microsoft Purview vs Sentra · Microsoft Purview vs Wiz
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data security posture management page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Microsoft PurviewFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSecuriti
Direct20
Paraphrase41
Comparative01
Budget-constrained701 against Securiti
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Microsoft Purview and Securiti stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Microsoft Purview Securiti first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Microsoft Purview on the left and Securiti on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Microsoft Purview and Securiti stood in it.
Microsoft Purview first, Securiti an alternative
2 of 14 modelsSecuriti was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Purview alternatives: Cyera, Securiti, Upwind
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Purview alternatives: Sentra
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Perplexity SonarCyera alternatives: BigID, Microsoft Purview, Sentra, Varonis Data Security Platform
Grok 4.20Wiz alternatives: Cyera DSPM, Securiti, Sentra
DeepSeek V4 FlashCyera alternatives: Securiti, Sentra, Wiz
GLM 4.7 FlashXCyera, Wiz alternatives: BigID, Microsoft Purview, Varonis Data Security Platform
GPT-6 LunaCyera alternatives: BigID, Microsoft Purview, Wiz
Neither was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Sentra alternatives: Cyera, Netwrix
GPT-5.4 miniSentra alternatives: BigID, Rubrik, Tenable
Gemini 3.5 FlashCyera alternatives: Concentric AI, Sentra, Wiz
Mistral SmallCyera, Wiz alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Varonis Data Security Platform
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice alternatives: Cyera, Varonis Data Security Platform, Wiz
Kimi K2Sentra alternatives: BigID, Cyera, Orca Security, Wiz
Muse Glimmer 30BCyera, Sentra alternatives: Wiz DSPM
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Microsoft Purview leads by thirty points.
Microsoft Purview30%#1 of 11Securiti0%#8 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Microsoft Purview leads by twenty-three points.
Microsoft Purview25%#1 of 11Securiti2%#7 of 11Enterprise
Microsoft Purview leads by twenty points.
Microsoft Purview20%#2 of 12Securiti0%#10 of 12What the models said about Microsoft Purview
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Microsoft Purview offers the best balance of features, integration, and market validation.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Securiti
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Platforms to Avoid on a Tight Budget” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“For Hybrid/AI-Heavy: Cyera or Securiti for comprehensive coverage.” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
“| Overall best balance | Varonis or Securiti |” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Strong AI-driven discovery across multicloud; great if you have diverse clouds, but it may require more setup than Purview.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared
Microsoft Purview vs CyeraMicrosoft Purview vs SentraMicrosoft Purview vs WizMicrosoft Purview vs Varonis Data Security PlatformMicrosoft Purview vs Amazon MacieMicrosoft Purview vs IBM GuardiumCyera vs SecuritiSentra vs SecuritiWiz vs SecuritiVaronis Data Security Platform vs SecuritiAmazon Macie vs SecuritiSecuriti vs IBM GuardiumAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full DSPM standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.