Ten of fourteen models named Microsoft Purview DLP first on the direct prompt; zero named Proofpoint Enterprise DLP. Microsoft Purview DLP was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Proofpoint Enterprise DLP by ten and Microsoft Purview DLP carries 64 labels and Proofpoint Enterprise DLP 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data loss prevention page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Microsoft Purview DLP and Proofpoint Enterprise DLP were named in the same answer fifty-nine times, of the 235 answers naming Microsoft Purview DLP and the 65 naming Proofpoint Enterprise DLP. In those answers Proofpoint Enterprise DLP took the first choice zero times and Microsoft Purview DLP twenty-seven.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Initial versions had high false positive rates - Complex policy creation for some users - Limited customization options in early iterations” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“protection weakens outside Microsoft services and custom classifiers may require training data and substantial tuning” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Microsoft Purview's endpoint controls have browser-specific requirements and supported-action differences” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“If your workforce relies primarily on Microsoft 365 and Windows endpoints, Microsoft Purview provides the lowest barrier to entry and fastest time to value.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Microsoft Purview DLP offers the best combination of price, functionality, and ease of use” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Microsoft Purview is consistently ranked #1 for bundled estate DLP because it's woven into the Microsoft 365 compliance stack.” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid treating it as a universal DLP solution if your principal risks involve USB, engineering workstations, network shares, or non-email channels” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Multiple administration consoles, limited predefined templates, false positive management burden” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“can afford higher costs/setup ... can require more expertise.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Mid-market DLP solutions from Microsoft Purview, Proofpoint, Netskope, or Forcepoint often hit the sweet spot” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Consider Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, which is particularly strong for email and collaboration protection.” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Other alternatives include Safetica, Forcepoint DLP, and Proofpoint Enterprise DLP.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.