Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › IT › Security operations › ASM › Attaxion vs UpGuard BreachSight
Attack surface management · November 2026 Edition

Attaxion vs UpGuard BreachSight

Zero of fourteen models named Attaxion first on the direct prompt; one named UpGuard BreachSight. Attaxion was named by twelve of the fourteen models and UpGuard BreachSight by eleven and Attaxion carries 20 labels and UpGuard BreachSight 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Attaxion

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

UpGuard BreachSight

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share19%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%9%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#6A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels2022A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Attaxion reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Intruder vs Attaxion · Intruder vs UpGuard BreachSight · Attaxion vs CyCognito

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the attack surface management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AttaxionFirst choices, of fourteen modelsUpGuard BreachSight
Direct01
Paraphrase11
Comparative00
Budget-constrained901 against UpGuard BreachSight
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Attaxion · 1 against UpGuard BreachSight
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Attaxion and UpGuard BreachSight were named in the same answer twenty-four times, of the 61 answers naming Attaxion and the 105 naming UpGuard BreachSight. In those answers UpGuard BreachSight took the first choice four times and Attaxion six.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Attaxion and UpGuard BreachSight stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Attaxion UpGuard BreachSight first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Attaxion on the left and UpGuard BreachSight on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Attaxion and UpGuard BreachSight stood in it.

UpGuard BreachSight first, Attaxion not the choice

1 of 14 modelsAttaxion was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
DeepSeek V4 FlashUpGuard BreachSight alternatives: CyCognito, Intruder, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Intruder alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, CyCognito, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Tenable Attack Surface Management, UpGuard BreachSight
Gemini 3.5 FlashCyCognito alternatives: Censys ASM, Detectify, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, UpGuard BreachSight
Perplexity SonarIntruder alternatives: Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, UpGuard BreachSight
MiniMax M2.5Intruder alternatives: Attaxion, Halo Security

Neither was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniCensys ASM alternatives: IONIX, Intruder, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Grok 4.20Intruder alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, CyCognito, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Mistral SmallCyCognito, Intruder alternatives: Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashTenable Vulnerability Management alternatives: Censys ASM, Dive, Rapid7
Kimi K2Intruder alternatives: CyCognito, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, SynScan
GLM 4.7 FlashXIntruder alternatives: CyCognito, SecurityScorecard
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Defender External Attack Surface Management alternatives: Censys ASM, CyCognito
Muse Glimmer 30BIntruder alternatives: CyCognito, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Attaxion leads by thirteen points.
Attaxion19%#2 of 14
UpGuard BreachSight6%#4 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Attaxion leads by fifteen points.
Attaxion19%#2 of 12
UpGuard BreachSight4%#6 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Attaxion0%#– of 10
UpGuard BreachSight0%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Attaxion

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Some newer tools (like Attaxion) lack integrations with ticketing systems and messaging platforms” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“For a small monthly budget ($100-350), Attaxion offers the best value with automated vulnerability scanning and continuous monitoring” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Value: Attaxion ... frequently cited as the best balance of price and performance for SMBs and startups.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Attaxion Starter at $129/mo for up to 40 assets is widely cited as the most affordable full EASM offering” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about UpGuard BreachSight

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“UpGuard has been reported to have false positives, limited API functionality, and customization limitations.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Offers published entry pricing and a free trial, but may be broader than basic EASM needs.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-market B2B companies, UpGuard offers the best balance of capability, price, and B2B-relevant features” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
Intruder vs AttaxionIntruder vs UpGuard BreachSightAttaxion vs CyCognitoAttaxion vs Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface ManagementAttaxion vs Censys ASMAttaxion vs Cortex XpanseAttaxion vs Tenable Attack Surface ManagementCyCognito vs UpGuard BreachSightMicrosoft Defender External Attack Surface Management vs UpGuard BreachSightCensys ASM vs UpGuard BreachSightUpGuard BreachSight vs Cortex XpanseUpGuard BreachSight vs Tenable Attack Surface ManagementAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full ASM standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.