Index › IT › Network and edge › WAF › Cloudflare WAF vs Sucuri WAF
Web application firewalls · November 2026 Edition

Cloudflare WAF vs Sucuri WAF

Thirteen of fourteen models named Cloudflare WAF first on the direct prompt; zero named Sucuri WAF. Cloudflare WAF was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Sucuri WAF by eleven and Cloudflare WAF carries 70 labels and Sucuri WAF 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Cloudflare WAF

endorsed leader

Named in two categories this edition.

Sucuri WAF

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share85%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%12%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels7017A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Cloudflare WAF reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.AWS WAF was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Cloudflare WAF vs AWS WAF · Cloudflare WAF vs Imperva Cloud WAF · Cloudflare WAF vs Barracuda WAF

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the web application firewalls page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Cloudflare WAFFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSucuri WAF
Direct1301 against Sucuri WAF
Paraphrase130
Comparative80
Budget-constrained1121 against Cloudflare WAF
Scale-constrained20
Negative003 against Cloudflare WAF · 1 against Sucuri WAF
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Cloudflare WAF and Sucuri WAF were named in the same answer sixty-nine times, of the 219 answers naming Cloudflare WAF and the 72 naming Sucuri WAF. In those answers Sucuri WAF took the first choice two times and Cloudflare WAF fifty-three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Cloudflare WAF and Sucuri WAF stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Cloudflare WAF Sucuri WAF first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Cloudflare WAF on the left and Sucuri WAF on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Cloudflare WAF and Sucuri WAF stood in it.

Cloudflare WAF first, Sucuri WAF not the choice

13 of 14 modelsSucuri WAF was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniCloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF, F5 Distributed Cloud WAF, Fastly Next-Gen WAF
Gemini 3.5 FlashCloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF, Fastly Next-Gen WAF, Imperva App Protect
Perplexity SonarCloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF, Barracuda WAF, Fastly Next-Gen WAF
Grok 4.20Cloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF, Azure WAF, Barracuda WAF, Fastly Next-Gen WAF
Mistral SmallCloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF, Imperva SecureSphere
DeepSeek V4 FlashCloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF, Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service, Imperva Application Security
Llama 4 MaverickCloudflare WAF
Qwen 3.7 FlashCloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF, Azure Front Door, F5 Distributed Cloud WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF
Kimi K2Cloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF
GLM 4.7 FlashXCloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF, Imperva Cloud WAF
MiniMax M2.5Cloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF, Azure WAF, Fastly Next-Gen WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb, Google Cloud Armor, Imperva Cloud WAF, Radware Cloud WAF Service
GPT-6 LunaCloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF
Muse Glimmer 30BCloudflare WAF alternatives: AWS WAF, Barracuda Web Application Firewall

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Barracuda WAF alternatives: Cloudflare WAF, Microsoft Azure WAF

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Cloudflare WAF leads by ninety-two points.
Cloudflare WAF94%#1 of 9
Sucuri WAF2%#2 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Cloudflare WAF leads by eighty points.
Cloudflare WAF85%#1 of 12
Sucuri WAF4%#2 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Cloudflare WAF leads by sixty points.
Cloudflare WAF60%#1 of 9
Sucuri WAF0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Cloudflare WAF

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Popular and low-latency, but criticized for outdated ModSecurity rules, support delays (e.g., 48+ hours), latency in some cases, false negatives, and bypasses” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“A significant 2024 vulnerability (discovered by Zafran) revealed a pervasive misconfiguration bug affecting these major WAF providers” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“These avoid high licensing costs (often $5K–$50K+/year for commercial tools like Cloudflare Enterprise, AWS WAF, or Imperva)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“For most mid‑market B2B companies the Cloudflare WAF is the easiest, most cost‑effective way to get enterprise‑grade protection today.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Cloudflare WAF with Bot Manager is the best overall choice due to its strong security, ease of deployment, and cost-effective pricing” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most small‑to‑midsize companies on a tight budget, Cloudflare’s free or low‑cost WAF tier is the best starting point.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Sucuri WAF

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“ModSecurity (open-source, used in many like OWASP CRS, AWS WAF, Sucuri, Azure): Very common but outdated signatures make it easy to bypass” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Small B2B sites with mainly CMS‑based content (less relevant for custom APIs)” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · soft negative
“For most small businesses, Sucuri provides the best balance of protection, features, and price.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“1. Sucuri (Best Overall for Budget)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Sucuri is highly recommended specifically for WordPress websites and small business sites” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.