Zero of fourteen models named Akamai Prolexic first on the direct prompt; zero named AWS Shield. Both were named by all fourteen models and Akamai Prolexic carries 48 labels and AWS Shield 63, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the ddos protection page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Akamai Prolexic and AWS Shield were named in the same answer 137 times, of the 156 answers naming Akamai Prolexic and the 182 naming AWS Shield. In those answers AWS Shield took the first choice one time and Akamai Prolexic eleven.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“avoid enterprise services such as Akamai Prolexic, Imperva, or dedicated Radware deployments” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“its pricing is often described as unpredictable and very high (starting around $30,000/year), making it less suitable for organizations with budget constraints” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some of the services that are mentioned as being potentially problematic include Akamai Prolexic, AWS Shield, DDoS-Guard, and Azure DDoS Protection.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“a managed, cloud-based DDoS protection service (like Cloudflare, Akamai, or AWS Shield) is likely the best fit” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice
“Cloudflare (ease + unmetered) or Akamai Prolexic (enterprise managed rigor) are common starting points” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“If you are a massive Global Fortune 500: Akamai remains the gold standard for sheer capacity and bespoke support.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid *AWS Shield Advanced*, as it costs a minimum of $3,000/month.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“These free, basic tiers are often criticized for limited capacity and failing to handle large-scale or sophisticated attacks.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“mentioned as being potentially problematic include Akamai Prolexic, AWS Shield, DDoS-Guard, and Azure DDoS Protection” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“a managed, cloud-based DDoS protection service (like Cloudflare, Akamai, or AWS Shield) is likely the best fit” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose AWS Shield Advanced, Azure DDoS Protection, or Google Cloud Armor when most workloads already reside in the corresponding cloud” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for AWS Users: AWS Shield Standard ... Caveat: It does *not* protect against sophisticated application-layer (Layer 7) attacks.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.