Zero of fourteen models named phpIPAM first on the direct prompt; two named Infoblox Universal DDI. phpIPAM was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Infoblox Universal DDI by fourteen and phpIPAM carries 23 labels and Infoblox Universal DDI 55, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the DDI and IP address management page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, phpIPAM and Infoblox Universal DDI were named in the same answer forty-six times, of the 83 answers naming phpIPAM and the 161 naming Infoblox Universal DDI. In those answers Infoblox Universal DDI took the first choice two times and phpIPAM twelve.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Use phpIPAM only if you have a small network, strong in-house Linux skills, and can accept the trade-offs in automation and support.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Open-source IPAM tools (e.g., unmaintained phpIPAM setups or custom GitHub wrappers) ... often lack automated sync features” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“It lacks the built-in DHCP/DNS servers of commercial suites but manages addresses efficiently.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Highly recommended for budget-conscious teams, especially if you need a simple, flexible, and self-hosted IP address management tool.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“phpIPAM and NetBox Both are free and widely used as a best-value starting point for a small / limited-budget team.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“open-source solutions like phpIPAM or entry-level commercial options like SolarWinds tend to offer the best value” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Some AI models explicitly recommend avoiding Infoblox unless you have a larger budget.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Some AI models recommend avoiding Infoblox unless you have a larger budget.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Budget - Infoblox: The market leader but expensive.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Strongest reputation in large enterprise / service provider DDI... "largest, most mature enterprise DDI platform, increasingly security + AI + cloud-managed"” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“Infoblox DDI is considered a market leader with comprehensive DDI features and strong security integrations, making it suitable for large enterprises.” Llama 4 Maverick · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Infoblox if you need a serious, long-term IPAM platform that can grow with hybrid or multi-cloud networking.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.