Index › IT › Data platform › Proxy and web data › Decodo vs Bright Data
Proxy and web data providers · November 2026 Edition

Decodo vs Bright Data

Eleven of fourteen models named Decodo first on the direct prompt; one named Bright Data. Both were named by all fourteen models and Decodo carries 51 labels and Bright Data 55, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Decodo

endorsed leader

Named in one category this edition.

Bright Data

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share57%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%27%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#6A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels5155A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Decodo reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Oxylabs was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Decodo vs Webshare · Decodo vs Smartproxy · Decodo vs DataImpulse

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the proxy and web data providers page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
DecodoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBright Data
Direct1114 against Bright Data
Paraphrase1302 against Bright Data
Comparative111
Budget-constrained603 against Bright Data
Scale-constrained00
Negative026 against Bright Data
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Decodo and Bright Data were named in the same answer 101 times, of the 133 answers naming Decodo and the 166 naming Bright Data. In those answers Bright Data took the first choice twenty-nine times and Decodo forty-three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Decodo and Bright Data stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Decodo Bright Data first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Decodo on the left and Bright Data on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Decodo and Bright Data stood in it.

Decodo first, Bright Data an alternative

11 of 14 modelsBright Data was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Decodo alternatives: NetNut, Oxylabs
Perplexity SonarDecodo alternatives: Oxylabs, SOAX
Grok 4.20Decodo alternatives: DataImpulse, IPRoyal, Proxidize, SOAX
Mistral SmallDecodo alternatives: DataImpulse, Proxidize, Proxyrack, Rayobyte
DeepSeek V4 FlashDecodo alternatives: IPRoyal, Infatica, Oxylabs, Proxidize, SOAX
Llama 4 MaverickDecodo alternatives: Oxylabs, Smartproxy, Webshare
Kimi K2Decodo, Smartproxy alternatives: DataImpulse, SOAX
GLM 4.7 FlashXDataImpulse, Decodo alternatives: IPRoyal, SOAX
MiniMax M2.5Decodo alternatives: Oxylabs, Proxidize, Smartproxy, Webshare
GPT-6 LunaDecodo alternatives: Bright Data, Oxylabs
Muse Glimmer 30BDecodo alternatives: Bright Data, Oxylabs, Proxidize, Smartproxy

Bright Data first, Decodo not the choice

1 of 14 modelsDecodo was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniBright Data, Oxylabs alternatives: NetNut, Smartproxy, Zyte API

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashSmartproxy alternatives: Bright Data, IPRoyal, NetNut, Oxylabs
Qwen 3.7 FlashSmartproxy alternatives: Bright Data, Oxylabs, Webshare

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Decodo leads by forty-three points.
Decodo49%#1 of 8
Bright Data6%#6 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Decodo leads by fifty-five points.
Decodo57%#1 of 13
Bright Data2%#6 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Bright Data leads at enterprise.
Bright Data47%#1 of 7
Decodo0%#4 of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Decodo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“For most small businesses, Decodo offers the best overall value due to its reliable network, transparent pricing, and strong feature set.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Decodo is the top recommendation due to its balance of ethical sourcing, extensive IP pool, granular targeting, and competitive pricing.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“my default recommendation would be Decodo (formerly Smartproxy) if you want the best balance of price, performance, and ease of use” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Bright Data

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid for mid-market: Pure enterprise (Bright Data, NetNut) if budget is a concern” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid premium providers like Oxylabs and Bright Data unless you have a larger budget” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for Budgets: Premium providers like Bright Data or Oxylabs” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“For enterprise or mission‑critical projects, consider a single vendor that spans all three layers (Bright Data, Oxylabs) to simplify integration and compliance.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Bright Data (formerly Luminati) | Massive network, advanced features, extensive proxy types | 72M+ IPs | Large enterprises, complex data needs” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Broad enterprise needs | Offers proxy networks as well as unblocking, browser, scraper API, SERP, and ready-made dataset products.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.