Seven of fourteen models named Azure Machine Learning first on the direct prompt; one named Amazon SageMaker. Both were named by all fourteen models and Azure Machine Learning carries 58 labels and Amazon SageMaker 67, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the ML platforms page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Azure Machine Learning and Amazon SageMaker were named in the same answer 169 times, of the 184 answers naming Azure Machine Learning and the 198 naming Amazon SageMaker. In those answers Amazon SageMaker took the first choice ten times and Azure Machine Learning nineteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Azure ML can be compromised through device code phishing, where attackers steal access tokens and exfiltrate models stored in the platform” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“SageMaker, Vertex AI, and Azure ML can simplify operations, but their proprietary APIs... can create vendor lock-in.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“compute costs can vary dramatically. It may not be suitable unless you have the necessary expertise and budget.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Azure Machine Learning or AWS SageMaker provide the best balance of features, scalability, and cost-effectiveness.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“Azure Machine Learning currently offers the best balance of cost flexibility, ease of use, AutoML capabilities, and enterprise integration” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with SageMaker AI, Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, or Azure Machine Learning if you're committed to that cloud.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid heavy enterprise tools like Databricks or full SageMaker unless you have specific needs” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“SageMaker, Vertex AI, and Azure ML can simplify operations, but their proprietary APIs, registries, pipelines, and deployment workflows can create vendor lock-in.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Heavily Integrated Cloud Platforms (e.g., AWS SageMaker, Google Vertex AI, Microsoft Azure ML): Why cautious? Strong vendor lock-in” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Start with SageMaker AI, Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, or Azure Machine Learning if you're committed to that cloud.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
“Azure Machine Learning or AWS SageMaker provide the best balance of features, scalability, and cost-effectiveness” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“recommend a managed cloud-native platform—usually AWS SageMaker AI, Azure Machine Learning, or Google Vertex AI” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.