Three of fourteen models named Fortra GoAnywhere MFT first on the direct prompt; zero named JSCAPE MFT Server. Fortra GoAnywhere MFT was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and JSCAPE MFT Server by nine and Fortra GoAnywhere MFT carries 24 labels and JSCAPE MFT Server 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the managed file transfer page.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“The GoAnywhere zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-10035) was a critical flaw that allowed attackers to execute remote commands without authentication” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Exploited by the Cl0p ransomware gang in a major 2023 campaign... its exposure makes it a higher‑risk choice” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“GoAnywhere has also suffered critical authentication bypass vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2024-0204)” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Best general-purpose enterprise choice: GoAnywhere provides a broad, centralized feature set for secure transfers and automated workflows.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“GoAnywhere is one of the most widely adopted MFT platforms... Choose GoAnywhere or MOVEit if you need an enterprise-wide solution” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder: Fortra GoAnywhere ... widely considered the gold standard for the mid-market” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“serves the mid-market with reasonable pricing and solid protocol support, though with fewer advanced automation features” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“The cost of JSCAPE MFT Server may seem relatively high for smaller organizations with limited budget.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“The best managed file transfer solution for a company with a limited budget is JSCAPE MFT or CData Arc” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for hybrid or on-premises needs... Pricing is quote-based (often $10K+ annually for mid-sized setups)” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Cross-platform, extensive automation features, good for automated B2B workflows” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.