Luzmo vs Embeddable
Two of fourteen models named Luzmo first on the direct prompt; zero named Embeddable. Luzmo was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Embeddable by eleven and Luzmo carries 35 labels and Embeddable 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the embedded analytics page.
By framing
LuzmoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsEmbeddable
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Luzmo and Embeddable were named in the same answer fifty-six times, of the 104 answers naming Luzmo and the 82 naming Embeddable. In those answers Embeddable took the first choice zero times and Luzmo twelve.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Luzmo Embeddable first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Luzmo on the left and Embeddable on the right.The direct prompt
Luzmo first, Embeddable an alternative
2 of 14 modelsEmbeddable was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Embeddable15%#2 of 15Luzmo0%#10 of 15What the models said about Luzmo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Avoid platforms like Luzmo ($2,000+/month)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Luzmo (€1,995+/month)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Luzmo is an embedded analytics platform built specifically for SaaS companies that need customer-facing dashboards with white-label control” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Luzmo — if you want to get customer-facing analytics live fast at a predictable mid-market price point” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“the default recommendation is Luzmo if customer-facing analytics is a core product feature” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Embeddable
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Embeddable (custom/flat but higher for unlimited use)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Qrvey or Embeddable are often recommended because their flat-rate/fixed pricing prevents unexpected costs as usage grows” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Embeddable is the top recommendation due to its focus on customer-facing analytics, security, and scalable pricing” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Consider embedded-native options like Embeddable, Plotly Dash, Retool, or Mode Analytics for better integration” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.