Embedded analytics · November 2026 Edition
Embeddable vs Apache Superset
Zero of fourteen models named Embeddable first on the direct prompt; zero named Apache Superset. Embeddable was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Apache Superset by nine and Embeddable carries 27 labels and Apache Superset 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%9%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#8A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels2711A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Embeddable reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Sisense was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Metabase vs Embeddable · Metabase vs Apache Superset · Luzmo vs Embeddable
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the embedded analytics page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
EmbeddableFirst choices, of fourteen modelsApache Superset
Direct00
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained111 against Embeddable
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Apache Superset
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Embeddable and Apache Superset stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Embeddable Apache Superset first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Embeddable on the left and Apache Superset on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Embeddable and Apache Superset stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashLuzmo alternatives: Embeddable, Explo, Omni, Qrvey
Perplexity SonarQrvey alternatives: Embeddable, GoodData, Holistics, Looker Embedded, Omni, Power BI Embedded, Sigma, Sisense
Kimi K2Microsoft Power BI Embedded alternatives: Embeddable, Looker, Luzmo, Sisense, Tableau Embedded Analytics
Muse Glimmer 30BQrvey alternatives: Dundas BI, Embeddable, Holistics, Luzmo, Omni, Power BI Embedded, Sisense, Zoho Analytics
Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice alternatives: Metabase, Microsoft Power BI Embedded, Omni, Sigma, Sisense
GPT-5.4 miniSisense alternatives: Looker, Metabase, Power BI Embedded, Toucan
Grok 4.20Microsoft Power BI Embedded alternatives: Domo Everywhere, Dundas BI, Looker, Qlik Sense Embedded, Qrvey, Sisense, Tableau Embedded Analytics
Mistral SmallCube, Sisense alternatives: Power BI Embedded, Tableau Embedded Analytics
DeepSeek V4 FlashLuzmo, Sisense alternatives: GoodData, Microsoft Power BI Embedded
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashSisense alternatives: GoodData, Looker, Luzmo, Qrvey, Zoho Analytics
GLM 4.7 FlashXSisense alternatives: Looker, Power BI Embedded
MiniMax M2.5Domo Everywhere, Microsoft Power BI Embedded alternatives: Looker, Qlik Embedded Analytics / QAP, Tableau Embedded Analytics
GPT-6 LunaMetabase alternatives: Looker, Power BI Embedded, Sigma
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Embeddable0%#8 of 13Apache Superset0%#– of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
Embeddable leads by two points.
Embeddable4%#6 of 15Apache Superset2%#8 of 15Enterprise
Embeddable leads by fifteen points.
Embeddable15%#2 of 15Apache Superset0%#– of 15What the models said about Embeddable
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Embeddable (custom/flat but higher for unlimited use)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Qrvey or Embeddable are often recommended because their flat-rate/fixed pricing prevents unexpected costs as usage grows” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Embeddable is the top recommendation due to its focus on customer-facing analytics, security, and scalable pricing” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Consider embedded-native options like Embeddable, Plotly Dash, Retool, or Mode Analytics for better integration” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · alternative
What the models said about Apache Superset
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Free software, but high DevOps overhead & manual multi-tenancy setup” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Apache Superset – fully customizable, open-source, and free to deploy.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Open-source like Apache Superset or Metabase can be cost-effective with customization but require more dev work” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · alternative
“Use Superset only if you have zero budget for software licenses but have plenty of engineering bandwidth” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared
Metabase vs EmbeddableMetabase vs Apache SupersetLuzmo vs EmbeddableLuzmo vs Apache SupersetSisense vs EmbeddableSisense vs Apache SupersetQrvey vs EmbeddableQrvey vs Apache SupersetMicrosoft Power BI Embedded vs EmbeddableMicrosoft Power BI Embedded vs Apache SupersetEmbeddable vs Zoho AnalyticsZoho Analytics vs Apache SupersetAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full embedded analytics standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.