Data virtualization · November 2026 Edition
Denodo vs Microsoft Fabric
Ten of fourteen models named Denodo first on the direct prompt; zero named Microsoft Fabric. Denodo was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Microsoft Fabric by eight and Denodo carries 66 labels and Microsoft Fabric 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share31%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate33%17%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#7A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels6612A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Denodo reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Dremio was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Denodo vs Dremio · Denodo vs Starburst Galaxy · Denodo vs Trino
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data virtualization page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
DenodoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMicrosoft Fabric
Direct1001 against Denodo
Paraphrase515 against Denodo · 1 against Microsoft Fabric
Comparative110
Budget-constrained006 against Denodo
Scale-constrained002 against Denodo
Negative308 against Denodo · 1 against Microsoft Fabric
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Denodo and Microsoft Fabric were named in the same answer twenty-eight times, of the 208 answers naming Denodo and the 45 naming Microsoft Fabric. In those answers Microsoft Fabric took the first choice two times and Denodo sixteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Denodo and Microsoft Fabric stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Denodo Microsoft Fabric first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Denodo on the left and Microsoft Fabric on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Denodo and Microsoft Fabric stood in it.
Denodo first, Microsoft Fabric an alternative
10 of 14 modelsMicrosoft Fabric was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniDenodo alternatives: Dremio, Starburst
Perplexity SonarDenodo alternatives: CData Virtuality, Dremio, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, Microsoft Fabric, SAP HANA, Starburst
Grok 4.20Denodo alternatives: CData Virtuality, Data Virtuality, Dremio, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Mistral SmallDenodo alternatives: Starburst Galaxy, TIBCO Data Virtualization, Trino
DeepSeek V4 FlashDenodo alternatives: Dremio, Starburst
Llama 4 MaverickDenodo
Qwen 3.7 FlashDenodo alternatives: Data Virtuality, Starburst Galaxy
GLM 4.7 FlashXDenodo alternatives: Data Virtuality, TIBCO Data Virtualization
MiniMax M2.5Denodo, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud alternatives: Data Virtuality, TIBCO Software
Muse Glimmer 30BDenodo alternatives: Dremio, Starburst Galaxy, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Dremio alternatives: Denodo, TIBCO Data Virtualization
Gemini 3.5 Flashno first choice alternatives: CData Connect Cloud, Cube, Denodo, Starburst Galaxy
GPT-6 LunaCData Virtuality alternatives: Denodo, Dremio
Neither was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Kimi K2CData Virtuality, Starburst Galaxy alternatives: Dremio
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Microsoft Fabric leads by four points.
Microsoft Fabric4%#– of 14Denodo0%#14 of 14Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Denodo leads at mid-market.
Denodo31%#1 of 10Microsoft Fabric2%#7 of 10Enterprise
Denodo leads by eighty points.
Denodo84%#1 of 9Microsoft Fabric4%#2 of 9What the models said about Denodo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“You generally want to avoid heavy, legacy Virtual Data Platforms (VDPs) like Denodo (which require expensive consulting contracts)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“To Avoid on a Tight Budget - Denodo — While a market leader, pricing starts around $0.08/GB and can get very expensive” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“While Denodo is generally well-regarded (4.3-4.6 ratings), some users note performance degradation with deeply nested views and complex multi-database joins.” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“one of the most recognized enterprise data virtualization platforms... choice tends to be driven by need for enterprise-grade logical data fabric with deep governance, Denodo and Informatica” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Denodo Platform (or its cloud-managed variant, Denodo Agora) is generally the best data virtualization platform for a mid-market B2B company.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with Denodo, IBM, or Spotfire Data Virtualization if you need a governed access layer used by multiple applications” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Microsoft Fabric
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Microsoft Fabric or Databricks used as "pure" virtualization by default... can create unnecessary platform, storage, and skills overhead” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Capacity-based pricing (~$32K-$100K+ annually); requires architecture rebuild if migrating” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Top Recommendation: Microsoft Fabric (with Starburst Galaxy integration)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Microsoft Fabric/Azure or AWS services when minimizing cloud-platform fragmentation matters most.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative
“wants an integrated Microsoft analytics platform rather than a source-agnostic virtualization layer” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared
Denodo vs DremioDenodo vs Starburst GalaxyDenodo vs TrinoDenodo vs StarburstDenodo vs CData VirtualityDenodo vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudDremio vs Microsoft FabricStarburst Galaxy vs Microsoft FabricTrino vs Microsoft FabricStarburst vs Microsoft FabricCData Virtuality vs Microsoft FabricMicrosoft Fabric vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management CloudAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full data virtualization standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.