Software composition analysis · November 2026 Edition
Mend.io – Mend SCA vs OWASP Dependency-Track
Three of fourteen models named Mend.io – Mend SCA first on the direct prompt; zero named OWASP Dependency-Track. Mend.io – Mend SCA was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and OWASP Dependency-Track by twelve and Mend.io – Mend SCA carries 41 labels and OWASP Dependency-Track 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share6%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate15%5%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 19; printed, not drawn.
Labels4121A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Mend.io – Mend SCA reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Snyk Open Source was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Snyk Open Source vs Mend.io – Mend SCA · Snyk Open Source vs OWASP Dependency-Track · Trivy vs Mend.io – Mend SCA
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the software composition analysis page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Mend.io – Mend SCAFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOWASP Dependency-Track
Direct301 against Mend.io – Mend SCA
Paraphrase02
Comparative10
Budget-constrained011 against OWASP Dependency-Track
Scale-constrained00
Negative004 against Mend.io – Mend SCA
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Mend.io – Mend SCA and OWASP Dependency-Track stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Mend.io – Mend SCA OWASP Dependency-Track first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Mend.io – Mend SCA on the left and OWASP Dependency-Track on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Mend.io – Mend SCA and OWASP Dependency-Track stood in it.
Mend.io – Mend SCA first, OWASP Dependency-Track not the choice
3 of 14 modelsOWASP Dependency-Track was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Mend.io – Mend SCA alternatives: Aikido Security, Snyk Open Source
Perplexity SonarMend.io – Mend SCA alternatives: Endor Labs, Snyk Open Source
MiniMax M2.5Mend.io – Mend SCA, Snyk Open Source alternatives: Sonatype Lifecycle
Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniSnyk Open Source alternatives: Mend.io – Mend SCA, OWASP Dependency-Check, OWASP Dependency-Track, Semgrep
Gemini 3.5 FlashSnyk Open Source alternatives: GitHub Advanced Security, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Semgrep Supply Chain, Socket
Grok 4.20Snyk Open Source alternatives: Black Duck, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Sonatype Lifecycle
DeepSeek V4 FlashSnyk Open Source alternatives: Mend.io – Mend SCA, Sonatype Lifecycle
Qwen 3.7 FlashSnyk Open Source alternatives: Black Duck, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Safeguard SCA, Trivy
GLM 4.7 FlashXSnyk Open Source alternatives: Mend.io – Mend SCA
GPT-6 LunaSnyk Open Source alternatives: GitHub Code Security, GitHub Dependabot, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Sonatype Lifecycle
Muse Glimmer 30BSnyk Open Source alternatives: Black Duck, Mend.io – Mend SCA, Sonatype Lifecycle
Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Mistral SmallSnyk Open Source alternatives: FOSSA, Trivy
Llama 4 MaverickSnyk Open Source alternatives: Endor Labs, FOSSA, Safeguard SCA, Semgrep Supply Chain, Socket
Kimi K2Aikido Security, Snyk Open Source alternatives: FOSSA, GitHub Advanced Security
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
OWASP Dependency-Track leads by two points.
OWASP Dependency-Track2%#6 of 14Mend.io – Mend SCA0%#12 of 14Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Mend.io – Mend SCA6%#5 of 19OWASP Dependency-Track6%#6 of 19Enterprise
OWASP Dependency-Track leads by nine points.
OWASP Dependency-Track17%#3 of 14Mend.io – Mend SCA7%#4 of 14What the models said about Mend.io – Mend SCA
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Mend.io: Powerful but historically complex to configure and priced for enterprise” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Use with Caution (For High-Volume Repositories) ... historically, it has struggled with accuracy and performance in very large codebases.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Most mainstream tools (Snyk, Black Duck, Dependabot, Whitesource/Mend, etc.) fall into this category to some degree.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Mend.io or Snyk would be the primary recommendations” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Mend.io stands out as the leading choice for many mid-market organizations.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Mend.io (best for automated remediation and proactive SCA)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about OWASP Dependency-Track
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Free and open source, but requires internal hosting and maintenance.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“my default recommendation would be OWASP Dependency-Track” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Primary Recommendation: OWASP Dependency-Track” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Start with OWASP Dependency-Track + Trivy.” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Snyk Open Source vs Mend.io – Mend SCASnyk Open Source vs OWASP Dependency-TrackTrivy vs Mend.io – Mend SCATrivy vs OWASP Dependency-TrackOWASP Dependency-Check vs Mend.io – Mend SCAOWASP Dependency-Check vs OWASP Dependency-TrackGitHub Dependabot vs Mend.io – Mend SCAGitHub Dependabot vs OWASP Dependency-TrackAll fifteen head-to-head pages and the full SCA standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.