Index › IT › Developer platform › API management › Zuplo vs Gravitee
API management · November 2026 Edition

Zuplo vs Gravitee

Zero of fourteen models named Zuplo first on the direct prompt; one named Gravitee. Zuplo was named by seven of the fourteen models and Gravitee by twelve and Zuplo carries 10 labels and Gravitee 32, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Zuplo

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

Gravitee

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share8%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%3%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#8A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1032A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Zuplo reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Kong Gateway was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Kong Gateway vs Zuplo · Kong Gateway vs Gravitee · Tyk vs Zuplo

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the API management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ZuploFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGravitee
Direct01
Paraphrase20
Comparative00
Budget-constrained30
Scale-constrained01
Negative011 against Gravitee
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Zuplo and Gravitee were named in the same answer forty times, of the 178 answers naming Zuplo and the 135 naming Gravitee. In those answers Gravitee took the first choice two times and Zuplo eleven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Zuplo and Gravitee stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Zuplo Gravitee first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Zuplo on the left and Gravitee on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Zuplo and Gravitee stood in it.

Gravitee first, Zuplo not the choice

1 of 14 modelsZuplo was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.20Gravitee alternatives: Apigee, Kong Gateway, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashKong Gateway alternatives: Azure API Management, Gravitee, Tyk
MiniMax M2.5Azure API Management, Kong Gateway alternatives: Apigee, Gravitee, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniKong Gateway alternatives: Apigee, Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Tyk
Perplexity SonarTyk alternatives: Apigee, Axway Amplify API Management, Azure API Management, Kong Gateway
Mistral SmallKong Gateway alternatives: Azure API Management, Tyk
DeepSeek V4 FlashKong Gateway alternatives: Azure API Management, Tyk
Llama 4 MaverickKong Gateway alternatives: Azure API Management, Tyk
Qwen 3.7 FlashKong Gateway alternatives: Amazon API Gateway, Azure API Management, Tyk
Kimi K2Kong Gateway alternatives: Azure API Management, Tyk
GLM 4.7 FlashXAzure API Management alternatives: Kong Gateway
GPT-6 LunaTyk alternatives: Apigee, Azure API Management, Kong Gateway
Muse Glimmer 30BKong Gateway alternatives: Azure API Management, Tyk

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Zuplo leads by nineteen points.
Zuplo19%#2 of 12
Gravitee0%#9 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Zuplo leads by five points.
Zuplo8%#3 of 11
Gravitee3%#8 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Gravitee leads at enterprise.
Gravitee4%#5 of 11
Zuplo2%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Zuplo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“For most small businesses, Zuplo Free or KrakenD Community offer the best balance of features, cost, and ease of use.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Gravitee

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“if you expect to rely heavily on features that exist only in paid tiers or managed offerings” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Gravitee (Strong Performer/Leader in Gartner 2024) ... Excellent for unified management of REST, GraphQL, and event-driven APIs” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
“Many companies of your size find Azure API Management, Kong, Tyk, or Gravitee offer the right balance.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Look at lightweight, cloud-native platforms like Kong, Tyk, Gravitee, or Fastly/Cloudflare” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.