Zero of fourteen models named Windsurf first on the direct prompt; zero named Cursor. Windsurf was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Cursor by fourteen and Windsurf carries 27 labels and Cursor 63, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI coding assistants page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Windsurf and Cursor were named in the same answer sixty-four times, of the 77 answers naming Windsurf and the 184 naming Cursor. In those answers Cursor took the first choice twelve times and Windsurf two.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“the individual version collects data by default, while enterprise versions offer zero-data-retention” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“cloud versions still risk data exfil. Some studies show similar vuln introduction rates.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Free tier available, but less capable on complex tasks per benchmark studies” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Codeium — Best Overall for Small Teams ... If you want zero cost and basic autocomplete: Go with Codeium.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Pick Cursor or Windsurf if: You want the most seamless experience for multi-file refactoring” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Start with Codeium (Free). Ask your engineers to try the free version.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Verdict: Use with extreme caution, especially without enterprise controls and Privacy Mode explicitly enabled.” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Cursor's pricing page indicates model usage can be billed separately at list price for third-party models, which can make spend less predictable.” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Be particularly cautious with: Autonomous agent modes in tools such as Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Aider, Devin, and Copilot Workspace” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Pick Cursor or Windsurf if: You want the most seamless experience for multi-file refactoring and rapid feature generation” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you want the most powerful AI experience and don't mind switching editors → Go with Cursor.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Cursor is currently the dominant choice due to its seamless balance of power and ease of use” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.