Mentoring software · RankedQooper
Qooper is enterprise mentoring software for employee development at scale · qooper.io ↗
Strongest at enterprise. Ranked 48 of 83 for small business buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Mentorloop is first at 44%.
Together is first at 47%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Together is first at 38%.
Why models recommend it
“Qooper leads for corporate career mentoring, new hire onboarding, leadership development, and DEI programs due to AI matching and enterprise integrations”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Comparative question · first choice
“Mentorloop and Qooper are particularly popular choices”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Direct question · first choice
“Choose this if measurement, ROI dashboards, advanced workflows, and enterprise integrations are more important”Perplexity Sonar · Paraphrase question · alternative
“Best when measurement, automated matching, and ROI reporting are priorities | Pricing is generally custom”Perplexity Sonar · Direct question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Enterprise products such as Chronus, MentorcliQ, Together, and Qooper are generally purchased by employers rather than individuals.”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“pricing starts higher (~$9,900/year for MentorcliQ) and is often quote-based—better if your budget can stretch”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“better suited for larger enterprises 5,000+ employees with deep HRIS integration”Muse Glimmer 30B · Paraphrase question · warning
“don't publish pricing and may quote enterprise-level rates”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Qooper, over the 125 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 111 | 25 | Compare → | |
| 106 | 38 | Compare → | |
| 85 | 11 | View → | |
| 68 | 20 | Compare → | |
| 42 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 25 | 0 | View → | |
| 23 | 1 | View → | |
| 21 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 18 | 0 | View → | |
| 15 | 1 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of Qooper →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Qooper's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- HR, L&D and Talent teams
- Price stated
- Request Pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, FedRAMP
- Hosting
- United States
- Customers named
- Tommy Bahama, Cotiviti, Northwell Health, BETMGM, Rentokil, BluSky, Trimble, Northwell
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 124 of the 125 answers that named Qooper and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
426 of the 493 domain citations in answers naming Qooper came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 413 | 63 | 2026-09-16 | Mentoring software, Succession planning | |
| Template or tool | 30 | 0 | 2026-02-25 | Employee onboarding, Mentoring software | |
| Case study | 22 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 17 | 1 | 2026-09-09 | Mentoring software | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 16 | undated | Employee onboarding | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 16 | 0 | 2025-09-26 | Performance management, Succession planning | |
| Report or ebook | 10 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-16Best in class mentoring software blog
- 2026-09-16Scaling enterprise mentoring blog
- 2026-09-15Ai mentor matching blog
- 2026-09-15Ai personalized mentoring for retention risk blog
- 2026-09-14Enterprise mentoring software implementation blog
- 2026-09-14How much administrative work enterprise mentoring software eliminates blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page qooper.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.