Six of fourteen models named LinkedIn Learning first on the direct prompt; one named TalentLMS. LinkedIn Learning was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and TalentLMS by twelve and LinkedIn Learning carries 62 labels and TalentLMS 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the online course libraries page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, LinkedIn Learning and TalentLMS were named in the same answer seventy-seven times, of the 267 answers naming LinkedIn Learning and the 456 naming TalentLMS. In those answers TalentLMS took the first choice fourteen times and LinkedIn Learning eight.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“LinkedIn Learning is also flagged in the same analysis for "high cost and opaque enterprise pricing, so it may be a poor fit if you need predictable budgeting."” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“often criticized for being "shallow"... users frequently report difficulties canceling free trials immediately, resulting in auto-renewal charges” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“massive (but expensive) libraries like LinkedIn Learning (~$20–40/user/month, better for larger enterprises)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“the most common mid-market B2B default is Udemy Business for breadth/price or LinkedIn Learning for brand-recognized professional skills” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, LinkedIn Learning offers the best balance of quality, price, and business-relevant content” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with Udemy Business or LinkedIn Learning if you want a plug-and-play content library with low friction.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Best overall for small businesses on a tight budget... TalentLMS: Best overall, with a free plan to test it on your real team.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.