Six of fourteen models named LinkedIn Learning first on the direct prompt; zero named Go1. LinkedIn Learning was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Go1 by nine and LinkedIn Learning carries 62 labels and Go1 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the online course libraries page.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“LinkedIn Learning is also flagged in the same analysis for "high cost and opaque enterprise pricing, so it may be a poor fit if you need predictable budgeting."” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“often criticized for being "shallow"... users frequently report difficulties canceling free trials immediately, resulting in auto-renewal charges” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“massive (but expensive) libraries like LinkedIn Learning (~$20–40/user/month, better for larger enterprises)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“the most common mid-market B2B default is Udemy Business for breadth/price or LinkedIn Learning for brand-recognized professional skills” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, LinkedIn Learning offers the best balance of quality, price, and business-relevant content” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with Udemy Business or LinkedIn Learning if you want a plug-and-play content library with low friction.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Top Recommendation: Go1 (Premium Essentials Plan)” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If curation and compliance reporting matter more, an aggregator like Go1 or a publisher library like Skillsoft / BizLibrary is typically preferred.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · alternative
“If you already have an LMS (e.g., BambooHR, Absorb, Docebo): Choose Go1” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.