Mentoring software · November 2026 Edition
Together vs MentorcliQ
Ten of fourteen models named Together first on the direct prompt; three named MentorcliQ. Both were named by all fourteen models and Together carries 50 labels and MentorcliQ 49, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
First-choice share47%11%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate10%20%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels5049A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Together reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Mentorloop was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Together vs Mentornity · Together vs Mentorloop · Together vs PushFar
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the mentoring software page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TogetherFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMentorcliQ
Direct1031 against MentorcliQ
Paraphrase1331 against MentorcliQ
Comparative262 against Together
Budget-constrained002 against Together · 4 against MentorcliQ
Scale-constrained201 against MentorcliQ
Negative101 against Together · 3 against MentorcliQ
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Together and MentorcliQ were named in the same answer 140 times, of the 184 answers naming Together and the 180 naming MentorcliQ. In those answers MentorcliQ took the first choice twenty-one times and Together forty-four.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Together and MentorcliQ stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Together MentorcliQ first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Together on the left and MentorcliQ on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Together and MentorcliQ stood in it.
Both were the first choice
2 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.Mistral SmallMentorcliQ, Together alternatives: Growthspace, Qooper
MiniMax M2.5MentorcliQ, Together alternatives: Chronus, Mentorgain, Mentorloop
Together first, MentorcliQ an alternative
8 of 14 modelsMentorcliQ was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniTogether alternatives: MentorcliQ, Mentorloop
Gemini 3.5 FlashTogether alternatives: Chronus, Mentorloop, Qooper
Perplexity SonarTogether alternatives: MentorcliQ, Mentorloop, Qooper
Grok 4.20Together alternatives: Chronus, MentorcliQ, Qooper
DeepSeek V4 FlashTogether alternatives: MentorcliQ, Mentorloop, Qooper
Kimi K2Together alternatives: MentorcliQ, Mentorloop, Qooper
GPT-6 LunaTogether alternatives: MentorcliQ, Mentorloop, Qooper
Muse Glimmer 30BTogether alternatives: Growthspace, MentorcliQ, Mentorloop, Ten Thousand Coffees
MentorcliQ first, Together not the choice
1 of 14 modelsTogether was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashMentorcliQ, Together Corporate Mentorship alternatives: Disprz, Mentorloop
Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Mentorloop, Qooper alternatives: Chronus, Together
Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
GLM 4.7 FlashXno first choice
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Together leads by twelve points.
Together14%#3 of 10MentorcliQ2%#6 of 10Mid-marketThe figures above
Together leads by thirty-six points.
Together47%#1 of 12MentorcliQ11%#2 of 12Enterprise
What the models said about Together
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid starting with enterprise platforms such as MentorcliQ or Together” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise products such as Chronus, MentorcliQ, Together, and Qooper are generally purchased by employers rather than individuals.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“now part of Absorb's broader learning management ecosystem rather than operating as an independent, dedicated mentoring platform” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Together Mentoring — Excellent for structured programs; strong matching, analytics, and ROI tracking. Popular with companies like yours; high user satisfaction (4.9/5).” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
“Together is a top recommendation due to its strong user ratings, comprehensive feature set, and proven fit for mid-market organizations” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd generally recommend Together Mentorship if your priority is a strong mix of ease of use, scalability, and measurable outcomes” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about MentorcliQ
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Do not use these platforms unless you have added significant manual "off-platform" safeguards.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid starting with enterprise platforms such as MentorcliQ or Together” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise products such as Chronus, MentorcliQ, Together, and Qooper are generally purchased by employers rather than individuals.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Together (by Mentor Collective) or MentorcliQ would be my top recommendations for a mid-sized B2B company” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Need heavy customization and scale? Chronus and MentorcliQ are the usual enterprise contenders.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“start with Together or MentorcliQ. Both are consistently rated highest by mid-market users” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.