Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › HR › Learning and development › Learning management syst › 360Learning vs Connecteam
Learning management systems · November 2026 Edition

360Learning vs Connecteam

One of fourteen models named 360Learning first on the direct prompt; zero named Connecteam. 360Learning was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Connecteam by ten and 360Learning carries 26 labels and Connecteam 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

360Learning

accepted challenger

Named in eight categories this edition.

Connecteam

accepted challenger

Named in eighteen categories this edition.

First-choice share6%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels2610A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, 360Learning reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.TalentLMS was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. TalentLMS vs 360Learning · TalentLMS vs Connecteam · Absorb LMS vs 360Learning

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the learning management systems page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
360LearningFirst choices, of fourteen modelsConnecteam
Direct10
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained11
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where 360Learning and Connecteam stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
360Learning Connecteam first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, 360Learning on the left and Connecteam on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where 360Learning and Connecteam stood in it.

360Learning first, Connecteam not the choice

1 of 14 modelsConnecteam was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral Small360Learning, Docebo alternatives: Absorb LMS, TalentLMS

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniAbsorb LMS alternatives: 360Learning, LearnUpon
Gemini 3.5 FlashAbsorb LMS alternatives: 360Learning, Docebo, LearnUpon, TalentLMS
DeepSeek V4 FlashAbsorb LMS alternatives: 360Learning, LearnUpon, TalentLMS
Kimi K2Absorb LMS, TalentLMS alternatives: 360Learning, Docebo, LearnUpon
GPT-6 LunaAbsorb LMS alternatives: 360Learning, Docebo, LearnUpon, TalentLMS
Muse Glimmer 30BTalentLMS alternatives: 360Learning, Absorb LMS, Docebo, LearnUpon

Neither was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Perplexity SonarLearnUpon alternatives: Bridge, D2L Brightspace, TalentLMS, Totara Learn, Trainual
Grok 4.20Absorb LMS alternatives: Docebo, TalentLMS
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashDocebo alternatives: Absorb LMS, TalentLMS, iSpring Learn
GLM 4.7 FlashXTalentLMS alternatives: Absorb LMS, Docebo, LearnUpon, iSpring Learn
MiniMax M2.5Absorb LMS alternatives: LearnUpon, TalentLMS

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Connecteam leads by six points.
Connecteam6%#2 of 11
360Learning0%#8 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: 360Learning leads at mid-market.
360Learning6%#5 of 14
Connecteam2%#7 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Connecteam is not named for this buyer.
360Learning0%#10 of 14
Connecteam—not named
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about 360Learning

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about Connecteam

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared
TalentLMS vs 360LearningTalentLMS vs ConnecteamAbsorb LMS vs 360LearningAbsorb LMS vs ConnecteamLearnUpon vs 360LearningLearnUpon vs ConnecteamDocebo vs 360LearningDocebo vs Connecteam360Learning vs Moodle LMSMoodle LMS vs ConnecteamAll twenty-one head-to-head pages and the full learning management syst standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.