Learning experience platforms · November 2026 Edition
Learn Amp vs Degreed
Two of fourteen models named Learn Amp first on the direct prompt; zero named Degreed. Learn Amp was named by eight of the fourteen models and Degreed by fourteen and Learn Amp carries 10 labels and Degreed 37, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%30%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#8A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1037A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Learn Amp reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Docebo was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. 360Learning vs Learn Amp · 360Learning vs Degreed · TalentLMS vs Learn Amp
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the learning experience platforms page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Learn AmpFirst choices, of fourteen modelsDegreed
Direct201 against Degreed
Paraphrase014 against Degreed
Comparative010
Budget-constrained003 against Degreed
Scale-constrained001 against Degreed
Negative002 against Degreed
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Learn Amp and Degreed stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Learn Amp Degreed first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Learn Amp on the left and Degreed on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Learn Amp and Degreed stood in it.
Learn Amp first, Degreed an alternative
2 of 14 modelsDegreed was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Learn Amp alternatives: 360Learning, Absorb LMS, Docebo
Llama 4 MaverickLearn Amp alternatives: 360Learning, Absorb LMS, Degreed, GoSkills
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Qwen 3.7 FlashAbsorb LMS alternatives: Degreed, Docebo, Learn Upon, TalentLMS
GPT-6 Luna360Learning alternatives: Absorb LMS, Degreed, Docebo
Muse Glimmer 30B360Learning alternatives: Absorb LMS, Docebo, Learn Amp, LearnUpon, TalentLMS
Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniLearnUpon alternatives: 360Learning, Docebo, Intellum
Gemini 3.5 FlashWorkRamp alternatives: 360Learning, Absorb LMS, Continu, Docebo
Perplexity SonarThinkific alternatives: Absorb LMS, Docebo, TalentLMS
Grok 4.20Absorb LMS alternatives: Docebo, LearnUpon, TalentLMS
Mistral Small360Learning, TalentLMS alternatives: Absorb LMS, GoSkills
DeepSeek V4 Flash360Learning alternatives: Absorb LMS, Docebo, LearnUpon
Kimi K2360Learning alternatives: Docebo, LearnUpon, TalentLMS
GLM 4.7 FlashX360Learning alternatives: Absorb LMS, Docebo, TalentLMS, iSpring Learn
MiniMax M2.5Absorb LMS, LearnUpon alternatives: 360Learning, Adobe Learning Manager, Docebo
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Learn Amp0%#– of 13Degreed0%#13 of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
Learn Amp is not named for this buyer.
Degreed28%#2 of 11Learn Amp—not namedWhat the models said about Learn Amp
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“The best learning experience platform for a mid-market B2B company is Learn Amp, as it is considered the best all-in-one mid-market learning platform.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“Learn Amp - Best all-in-one mid-market learning platform” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Learn Amp if coaching, engagement, and performance development matter as much as course delivery.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative
What the models said about Degreed
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What I'd avoid: Cornerstone and Degreed unless you're a large enterprise” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Some enterprise-focused LXPs (like Degreed, Docebo, and Learnerbly) are only practical for very large organizations (250+ learners) and are not cost-effective for smaller teams.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Traditional enterprise LXPs (like Degreed or Cornerstone/EdCast) are built for large corporations and often come with five-figure implementation fees and heavy sales contracts.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Considered the category-defining "skills-first" LXP... If you want a skills-first approach with massive content aggregation → Degreed” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Degreed is repeatedly positioned as the gold standard for skills-first learning and capability development.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Degreed essentially *defined* the LXP category and focuses on building a comprehensive skills architecture” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
360Learning vs Learn Amp360Learning vs DegreedTalentLMS vs Learn AmpTalentLMS vs DegreedAbsorb LMS vs Learn AmpAbsorb LMS vs DegreedGoSkills vs Learn AmpGoSkills vs DegreedLearnUpon vs Learn AmpLearnUpon vs DegreedLearn Amp vs DoceboDocebo vs DegreedAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full learning experience plat standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.