Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › HR › Learning and development › Learning experience plat › GoSkills vs LearnUpon
Learning experience platforms · November 2026 Edition

GoSkills vs LearnUpon

Zero of fourteen models named GoSkills first on the direct prompt; two named LearnUpon. GoSkills was named by twelve of the fourteen models and LearnUpon by eight and GoSkills carries 17 labels and LearnUpon 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.

GoSkills

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

LearnUpon

accepted challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

First-choice share6%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1713A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, GoSkills reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Docebo was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. 360Learning vs GoSkills · 360Learning vs LearnUpon · TalentLMS vs GoSkills

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the learning experience platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GoSkillsFirst choices, of fourteen modelsLearnUpon
Direct02
Paraphrase01
Comparative00
Budget-constrained30
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where GoSkills and LearnUpon stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
GoSkills LearnUpon first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, GoSkills on the left and LearnUpon on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where GoSkills and LearnUpon stood in it.

LearnUpon first, GoSkills not the choice

2 of 14 modelsGoSkills was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniLearnUpon alternatives: 360Learning, Docebo, Intellum
MiniMax M2.5Absorb LMS, LearnUpon alternatives: 360Learning, Adobe Learning Manager, Docebo

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.20Absorb LMS alternatives: Docebo, LearnUpon, TalentLMS
Mistral Small360Learning, TalentLMS alternatives: Absorb LMS, GoSkills
DeepSeek V4 Flash360Learning alternatives: Absorb LMS, Docebo, LearnUpon
Llama 4 MaverickLearn Amp alternatives: 360Learning, Absorb LMS, Degreed, GoSkills
Kimi K2360Learning alternatives: Docebo, LearnUpon, TalentLMS
Muse Glimmer 30B360Learning alternatives: Absorb LMS, Docebo, Learn Amp, LearnUpon, TalentLMS

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Learn Amp alternatives: 360Learning, Absorb LMS, Docebo
Gemini 3.5 FlashWorkRamp alternatives: 360Learning, Absorb LMS, Continu, Docebo
Perplexity SonarThinkific alternatives: Absorb LMS, Docebo, TalentLMS
Qwen 3.7 FlashAbsorb LMS alternatives: Degreed, Docebo, Learn Upon, TalentLMS
GLM 4.7 FlashX360Learning alternatives: Absorb LMS, Docebo, TalentLMS, iSpring Learn
GPT-6 Luna360Learning alternatives: Absorb LMS, Degreed, Docebo

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
GoSkills leads by twenty-six points.
GoSkills26%#2 of 13
LearnUpon0%#– of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
GoSkills6%#4 of 12
LearnUpon6%#5 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
GoSkills0%#– of 11
LearnUpon0%#6 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about GoSkills

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“GoSkills and TalentLMS are often recommended as the best affordable learning experience platforms” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about LearnUpon

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“start with 360Learning (internal/collaborative focus) or LearnUpon (if customer training is a priority)” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
360Learning vs GoSkills360Learning vs LearnUponTalentLMS vs GoSkillsTalentLMS vs LearnUponAbsorb LMS vs GoSkillsAbsorb LMS vs LearnUponGoSkills vs Learn AmpGoSkills vs DoceboGoSkills vs DegreedLearnUpon vs Learn AmpLearnUpon vs DoceboLearnUpon vs DegreedAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full learning experience plat standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.