Index › HR › Learning and development › Course authoring tools › 360Learning vs Easygenerator
Course authoring tools · November 2026 Edition

360Learning vs Easygenerator

Zero of fourteen models named 360Learning first on the direct prompt; one named Easygenerator. 360Learning was named by nine of the fourteen models and Easygenerator by thirteen and 360Learning carries 10 labels and Easygenerator 35, so the shares are not directly comparable.

360Learning

accepted challenger

Named in eight categories this edition.

Easygenerator

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share11%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%3%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1035A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, 360Learning reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Articulate 360 was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Articulate 360 vs 360Learning · Articulate 360 vs Easygenerator · H5P vs 360Learning

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the course authoring tools page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
360LearningFirst choices, of fourteen modelsEasygenerator
Direct01
Paraphrase60
Comparative00
Budget-constrained011 against Easygenerator
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where 360Learning and Easygenerator stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
360Learning Easygenerator first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, 360Learning on the left and Easygenerator on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where 360Learning and Easygenerator stood in it.

Easygenerator first, 360Learning not the choice

1 of 14 models360Learning was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
MiniMax M2.5Easygenerator alternatives: Articulate 360, iSpring Suite

Neither was the first choice, one was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashArticulate 360 alternatives: Easygenerator, Elucidat, dominKnow | ONE, iSpring Suite
Perplexity SonarArticulate 360 alternatives: Adobe Captivate, Easygenerator, iSpring Suite
Grok 4.20Articulate 360 alternatives: Easygenerator, iSpring Suite
Mistral SmallArticulate 360 alternatives: Adobe Captivate, Easygenerator, iSpring Suite
Qwen 3.7 FlashArticulate 360 alternatives: Adobe Captivate, Easygenerator, iSpring Suite
Kimi K2iSpring Suite alternatives: Articulate 360, Easygenerator, Elucidat
GLM 4.7 FlashXArticulate 360 alternatives: Adobe Captivate, Coassemble, Easygenerator, iSpring Suite
GPT-6 LunaArticulate 360 alternatives: Easygenerator, dominKnow | ONE

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniArticulate 360 alternatives: Adobe Captivate, Elucidat, iSpring Suite
DeepSeek V4 FlashArticulate 360 alternatives: iSpring Suite
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Muse Glimmer 30BArticulate 360 alternatives: iSpring Suite

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Easygenerator leads by eight points.
Easygenerator8%#4 of 11
360Learning0%#– of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: 360Learning leads at mid-market.
360Learning11%#4 of 11
Easygenerator4%#5 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Easygenerator leads at enterprise.
Easygenerator9%#4 of 9
360Learning0%#9 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about 360Learning

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“360Learning and LearnUpon are the most recommended due to their scalability, corporate-focused features, and strong user ratings.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Easygenerator

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Avoid Articulate 360 ($1,449+ per user/year) and Easygenerator ($1,399+/year)” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Easygenerator is the best low‑cost paid tool” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Easygenerator” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Easygenerator if saving authoring time and enabling nontechnical employees to build courses is worth paying roughly $1,500 annually.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.