Compliance training · November 2026 Edition
EasyLlama vs SC Training
One of fourteen models named EasyLlama first on the direct prompt; zero named SC Training. EasyLlama was named by twelve of the fourteen models and SC Training by ten and EasyLlama carries 28 labels and SC Training 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
First-choice share10%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#7A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels2812A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, EasyLlama reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Absorb LMS was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. TalentLMS vs EasyLlama · TalentLMS vs SC Training · Traliant vs EasyLlama
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the compliance training page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
EasyLlamaFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSC Training
Direct10
Paraphrase20
Comparative00
Budget-constrained221 against SC Training
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where EasyLlama and SC Training stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
EasyLlama SC Training first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, EasyLlama on the left and SC Training on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where EasyLlama and SC Training stood in it.
EasyLlama first, SC Training not the choice
1 of 14 modelsSC Training was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.DeepSeek V4 FlashEasyLlama, Traliant alternatives: Absorb LMS, Coggno, TalentLMS
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Absorb LMS, BizLibrary alternatives: EasyLlama, SAP Litmos, Skillsoft Percipio
Gemini 3.5 FlashEthena alternatives: Drata, EasyLlama, KnowBe4 Compliance Plus, Traliant, Vanta
Grok 4.20Absorb LMS alternatives: Academy of Mine, EasyLlama, TalentLMS, iSpring Learn
GLM 4.7 FlashXBizLibrary alternatives: Absorb LMS, EasyLlama, LearnUpon, ProProfs Training Maker, SAP Litmos, TalentLMS
Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniAbsorb LMS alternatives: Continu, Docebo, iSpring Learn
Perplexity SonarAbsorb LMS alternatives: BizLibrary, Continu, LearnUpon, TalentLMS, Thinkific, Trainual
Mistral SmallSAP Litmos, TalentLMS alternatives: Academy of Mine, Coggno, LearnUpon
Llama 4 MaverickBizLibrary alternatives: Absorb LMS, Coggno, Edmingle, TechClass
Qwen 3.7 FlashCoggno alternatives: TechClass
Kimi K2Absorb LMS, Coggno alternatives: LearnUpon, TalentLMS
MiniMax M2.5Coggno alternatives: Absorb LMS, LearnUpon, ProProfs Training Maker, TalentLMS
GPT-6 LunaEthena alternatives: NAVEX, Traliant
Muse Glimmer 30BCoggno alternatives: Absorb LMS, Docebo, NAVEX, SAP Litmos, TalentLMS, Traliant
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
EasyLlama leads by twenty-four points.
EasyLlama31%#1 of 9SC Training7%#4 of 9Mid-marketThe figures above
EasyLlama leads by six points.
EasyLlama10%#4 of 15SC Training4%#7 of 15Enterprise
EasyLlama leads by two points.
EasyLlama2%#11 of 14SC Training0%#– of 14What the models said about EasyLlama
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“I recommend EasyLlama or Traliant as top harassment prevention training providers.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with EasyLlama or Traliant” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“EasyLlama and Coggno are particularly strong contenders” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about SC Training
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Completely free for basic compliance tracking and courses—worth trying if your needs are minimal, though it lacks advanced features.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“SC Training (EdApp) is the best choice because it offers a genuinely free tier (up to 10 users) with a large compliance course library” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“SC Training (formerly EdApp) is a strong default choice for compliance training” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
TalentLMS vs EasyLlamaTalentLMS vs SC TrainingTraliant vs EasyLlamaTraliant vs SC TrainingEthena vs EasyLlamaEthena vs SC TrainingEasyLlama vs CoggnoEasyLlama vs Absorb LMSEasyLlama vs SAP LitmosCoggno vs SC TrainingAbsorb LMS vs SC TrainingSC Training vs SAP LitmosAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full compliance training standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.