Compliance training · November 2026 Edition
Coggno vs SAP Litmos
Four of fourteen models named Coggno first on the direct prompt; one named SAP Litmos. Coggno was named by nine of the fourteen models and SAP Litmos by eight and Coggno carries 18 labels and SAP Litmos 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share10%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%17%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels1812A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Coggno reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Absorb LMS was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. TalentLMS vs Coggno · TalentLMS vs SAP Litmos · Traliant vs Coggno
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the compliance training page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CoggnoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSAP Litmos
Direct411 against SAP Litmos
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained101 against SAP Litmos
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Coggno and SAP Litmos stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | | |||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Coggno SAP Litmos first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Coggno on the left and SAP Litmos on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Coggno and SAP Litmos stood in it.
Coggno first, SAP Litmos an alternative
4 of 14 modelsSAP Litmos was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashCoggno alternatives: TechClass
Kimi K2Absorb LMS, Coggno alternatives: LearnUpon, TalentLMS
MiniMax M2.5Coggno alternatives: Absorb LMS, LearnUpon, ProProfs Training Maker, TalentLMS
Muse Glimmer 30BCoggno alternatives: Absorb LMS, Docebo, NAVEX, SAP Litmos, TalentLMS, Traliant
SAP Litmos first, Coggno an alternative
1 of 14 modelsCoggno was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mistral SmallSAP Litmos, TalentLMS alternatives: Academy of Mine, Coggno, LearnUpon
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Absorb LMS, BizLibrary alternatives: EasyLlama, SAP Litmos, Skillsoft Percipio
DeepSeek V4 FlashEasyLlama, Traliant alternatives: Absorb LMS, Coggno, TalentLMS
Llama 4 MaverickBizLibrary alternatives: Absorb LMS, Coggno, Edmingle, TechClass
GLM 4.7 FlashXBizLibrary alternatives: Absorb LMS, EasyLlama, LearnUpon, ProProfs Training Maker, SAP Litmos, TalentLMS
Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniAbsorb LMS alternatives: Continu, Docebo, iSpring Learn
Gemini 3.5 FlashEthena alternatives: Drata, EasyLlama, KnowBe4 Compliance Plus, Traliant, Vanta
Perplexity SonarAbsorb LMS alternatives: BizLibrary, Continu, LearnUpon, TalentLMS, Thinkific, Trainual
Grok 4.20Absorb LMS alternatives: Academy of Mine, EasyLlama, TalentLMS, iSpring Learn
GPT-6 LunaEthena alternatives: NAVEX, Traliant
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
What the models said about Coggno
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Coggno fits this profile out of the box, with 10,000+ compliance courses across 25+ categories” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“The Top All-in-One Choice: Coggno ... is currently rated as the highest value solution” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“EasyLlama and Coggno are particularly strong contenders” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about SAP Litmos
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“compared to pricier alternatives like Docebo or Litmos” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“though it is often pricier than the newer entrants” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Litmos and TalentLMS are the top recommendations due to their balance of ready-made compliance content, audit readiness, and cost-effectiveness” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Litmos positions itself as a mid-market solution that combines the LMS functionality organizations need” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · alternative
“If you need strong audit evidence and jurisdictional coverage: Absorb LMS or Litmos.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared
TalentLMS vs CoggnoTalentLMS vs SAP LitmosTraliant vs CoggnoTraliant vs SAP LitmosEthena vs CoggnoEthena vs SAP LitmosEasyLlama vs CoggnoEasyLlama vs SAP LitmosCoggno vs Absorb LMSCoggno vs SC TrainingAbsorb LMS vs SAP LitmosSC Training vs SAP LitmosAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full compliance training standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.