Index › HR › Core HR and payroll › Workforce scheduling › Sling vs Homebase
Workforce scheduling · November 2026 Edition

Sling vs Homebase

Zero of fourteen models named Sling first on the direct prompt; zero named Homebase. Both were named by all fourteen models and Sling carries 36 labels and Homebase 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Sling

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

Homebase

accepted challenger

Named in twelve categories this edition.

First-choice share25%10%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%4%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels3623A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Sling reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Deputy was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Deputy vs Sling · Deputy vs Homebase · Sling vs When I Work

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workforce scheduling page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SlingFirst choices, of fourteen modelsHomebase
Direct001 against Homebase
Paraphrase002 against Sling
Comparative00
Budget-constrained135
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Sling and Homebase were named in the same answer seventy-four times, of the 103 answers naming Sling and the 382 naming Homebase. In those answers Homebase took the first choice fifteen times and Sling eighteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Sling and Homebase stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Sling Homebase first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Sling on the left and Homebase on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Sling and Homebase stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarDeputy alternatives: Connecteam, Planday, Sling, When I Work
Grok 4.20Deputy alternatives: Connecteam, Sling, When I Work
Mistral SmallWhen I Work alternatives: Deputy, Sling
DeepSeek V4 FlashWhen I Work alternatives: Deputy, Planday, Sling
Qwen 3.7 FlashWhen I Work alternatives: Deputy, Sling, TimeForge
Kimi K2Deputy alternatives: Sling, When I Work
GLM 4.7 FlashXDeputy, When I Work alternatives: Connecteam, Planday, Sling
MiniMax M2.5Deputy, When I Work alternatives: Connecteam, QuickBooks Time, Sling
Muse Glimmer 30BWhen I Work alternatives: Connecteam, Deputy, Planday, Sling

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniRippling, UKG Ready alternatives: Connecteam, Deputy
Gemini 3.5 FlashFloat alternatives: Connecteam, Deputy, Resource Guru, Rippling
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
GPT-6 LunaDeputy alternatives: UKG Ready

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Homebase leads by four points.
Homebase24%#2 of 8
Sling20%#3 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Sling leads at mid-market.
Sling25%#2 of 11
Homebase10%#4 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Sling0%#– of 13
Homebase0%#– of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Sling

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“more capable than lightweight tools such as Sling, without immediately requiring an enterprise workforce-management platform” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Good starter option (~$2–$4/user/month) but may lack depth in compliance/reporting for growing mid-sized firms.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Sling is likely your best bet—it offers the most comprehensive free plan combined with very affordable paid upgrades” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“If you're on a very tight budget, start with Sling or Homebase as both offer genuinely useful free plans” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“The best employee scheduling software for a company with a limited budget is Sling, which is a free option” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Homebase

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.