Paylocity vs Gusto
One of fourteen models named Paylocity first on the direct prompt; zero named Gusto. Paylocity was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Gusto by fourteen and Paylocity carries 32 labels and Gusto 45, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in nineteen categories this edition.
Named in twenty-one categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the payroll software page.
By framing
PaylocityFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGusto
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Paylocity and Gusto were named in the same answer eighty-eight times, of the 279 answers naming Paylocity and the 855 naming Gusto. In those answers Gusto took the first choice thirteen times and Paylocity four.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Paylocity Gusto first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Paylocity on the left and Gusto on the right.The direct prompt
Paylocity first, Gusto not the choice
1 of 14 modelsGusto was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Gusto58%#1 of 13Paylocity2%#– of 13Paylocity8%#4 of 18Gusto2%#8 of 18Paylocity0%#12 of 15Gusto0%#15 of 15What the models said about Paylocity
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“AVOID Paylocity at all costs" describes a mid-sized company transition ... "nothing short of disastrous.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
What the models said about Gusto
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Complaints include unexpected fees, continuing memberships, and downtime where employees aren't paid” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Gusto leads on user experience and integrated benefits (health insurance, 401(k), workers' comp). Best if you want payroll and HR in one place.” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Under 50 employees (US-based): Look into modern, full-service, transparently-priced platforms like Gusto, OnPay, or Patriot Payroll.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Choose Gusto if you have under 50 domestic US employees and want a modern, affordable, easy-to-use platform with solid basic HR.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.