Mindmatrix vs Channelscaler
Zero of fourteen models named Mindmatrix first on the direct prompt; one named Channelscaler. Mindmatrix was named by ten of the fourteen models and Channelscaler by eight and Mindmatrix carries 18 labels and Channelscaler 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
San Mateo, United States, founded 2010. Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the channel partner and local marketing page.
By framing
MindmatrixFirst choices, of fourteen modelsChannelscaler
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Mindmatrix and Channelscaler were named in the same answer thirty-one times, of the 70 answers naming Mindmatrix and the 161 naming Channelscaler. In those answers Channelscaler took the first choice one time and Mindmatrix one.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | | |||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Mindmatrix Channelscaler first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Mindmatrix on the left and Channelscaler on the right.The direct prompt
Channelscaler first, Mindmatrix not the choice
1 of 14 modelsMindmatrix was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Mindmatrix3%#10 of 18Channelscaler0%#17 of 18Mindmatrix2%#7 of 11Channelscaler2%#8 of 11Mindmatrix2%#7 of 10Channelscaler2%#– of 10What the models said about Mindmatrix
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“What to Avoid on a Limited Budget ... Mindmatrix | Custom quote | Full PRM + marketing suite” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Mixed feedback ... Complaints include clunky UI, limited customization for partner campaigns” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Start with Mindmatrix if you can justify ~$6,000/year — it's purpose-built and won't force you to migrate later.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“While SproutLoud and Mindmatrix are the primary pure-play TCMA leaders” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“For through-channel marketing at scale, Mindmatrix is a top choice” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Channelscaler
No label in this category carried a quote.
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.