Refersion vs Tapfiliate
Zero of fourteen models named Refersion first on the direct prompt; zero named Tapfiliate. Refersion was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Tapfiliate by eleven and Refersion carries 17 labels and Tapfiliate 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the affiliate and partner management page.
By framing
RefersionFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTapfiliate
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Refersion and Tapfiliate were named in the same answer forty-three times, of the 66 answers naming Refersion and the 87 naming Tapfiliate. In those answers Tapfiliate took the first choice six times and Refersion five.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Refersion Tapfiliate first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Refersion on the left and Tapfiliate on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
13 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Tapfiliate8%#5 of 13Refersion3%#7 of 13Refersion2%#6 of 16Tapfiliate2%#7 of 16Tapfiliate6%#3 of 10Refersion0%#– of 10What the models said about Refersion
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“The Best Overall for Startups: Refersion ... widely considered the most affordable and scalable option” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“start with software like Rewardful (SaaS) or Refersion (e-commerce) if under $10M revenue” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Consider a white-label tool like Refersion or Tapfiliate to avoid sharing revenue with a network” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
What the models said about Tapfiliate
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Rewardful and Tapfiliate are affiliate management platforms that fall short for serious affiliate programs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“For most companies with a limited budget, Tapfiliate is usually the best balance” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“Offers a starting price of €74/month and is self-managed, making it a cost-effective choice for small businesses.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · alternative
“Tapfiliate supports affiliate, referral, and influencer programs and is suited for mid-tier pricing.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.