PartnerStack vs impact.com
Fourteen of fourteen models named PartnerStack first on the direct prompt; two named impact.com. Both were named by all fourteen models and PartnerStack carries 52 labels and impact.com 55, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the affiliate and partner management page.
By framing
PartnerStackFirst choices, of fourteen modelsimpact.com
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, PartnerStack and impact.com were named in the same answer 243 times, of the 439 answers naming PartnerStack and the 364 naming impact.com. In those answers impact.com took the first choice thirty-two times and PartnerStack sixty-five.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
PartnerStack impact.com first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, PartnerStack on the left and impact.com on the right.The direct prompt
Both were the first choice
2 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.PartnerStack first, impact.com an alternative
12 of 14 modelsimpact.com was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
PartnerStack15%#2 of 13impact.com0%#12 of 13PartnerStack56%#1 of 16impact.com6%#2 of 16PartnerStack38%#1 of 10impact.com34%#2 of 10What the models said about PartnerStack
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise platforms such as PartnerStack, which starts near $1,000/month” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools: Skip Impact, PartnerStack, or Everflow unless scaling” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Start with PartnerStack if you're in B2B SaaS/Services, or Impact.com if you want a comprehensive partnership management platform.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about impact.com
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Low Trustpilot scores (around 1.2/5 from hundreds of reviews). Common issues include buggy/slow UI, lost commissions” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“avoid large affiliate networks (like CJ Affiliate, Rakuten, or Impact) right now” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Global enterprise, multi-program type (affiliate + influencer + B2B partner), strongest tracking/reporting infrastructure” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“the landscape is dominated by two platforms: PartnerStack and impact.com” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.