impact.com vs Post Affiliate Pro
Two of fourteen models named impact.com first on the direct prompt; zero named Post Affiliate Pro. impact.com was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Post Affiliate Pro by nine and impact.com carries 55 labels and Post Affiliate Pro 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the affiliate and partner management page.
By framing
impact.comFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPost Affiliate Pro
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, impact.com and Post Affiliate Pro were named in the same answer fifty-one times, of the 364 answers naming impact.com and the 72 naming Post Affiliate Pro. In those answers Post Affiliate Pro took the first choice one time and impact.com eight.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
impact.com Post Affiliate Pro first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, impact.com on the left and Post Affiliate Pro on the right.The direct prompt
impact.com first, Post Affiliate Pro an alternative
2 of 14 modelsPost Affiliate Pro was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Post Affiliate Pro2%#8 of 13impact.com0%#12 of 13impact.com6%#2 of 16Post Affiliate Pro2%#5 of 16impact.com34%#2 of 10Post Affiliate Pro2%#7 of 10What the models said about impact.com
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Low Trustpilot scores (around 1.2/5 from hundreds of reviews). Common issues include buggy/slow UI, lost commissions” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“avoid large affiliate networks (like CJ Affiliate, Rakuten, or Impact) right now” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Global enterprise, multi-program type (affiliate + influencer + B2B partner), strongest tracking/reporting infrastructure” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“the landscape is dominated by two platforms: PartnerStack and impact.com” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Post Affiliate Pro
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“If you need the absolute lowest cost, Affiliatly and Post Affiliate Pro are excellent starting points.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“The Best for Lowest Long-Term Costs: Post Affiliate Pro ... often the cheapest option over time” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
“Best For: Cost-effective flexibility... Lowest barrier to entry (starting around $89/month)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.