Fourteen of fourteen models named Google Tag Manager first on the direct prompt; zero named Adobe Experience Platform Tags. Google Tag Manager was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Adobe Experience Platform Tags by thirteen and Google Tag Manager carries 79 labels and Adobe Experience Platform Tags 51, so the shares are not directly comparable.
By Google, Mountain View, California, United States, founded 1998. Named in two categories this edition.
By Adobe, San Jose, United States, founded 1982. Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the tag management page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Google Tag Manager and Adobe Experience Platform Tags were named in the same answer 159 times, of the 230 answers naming Google Tag Manager and the 167 naming Adobe Experience Platform Tags. In those answers Adobe Experience Platform Tags took the first choice five times and Google Tag Manager eighty-five.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“experts recommend avoiding its paid enterprise suite (GTM 360) unless you have a clear, justified need” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“GTM 360 (Avoid Unless Necessary)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Free, strong Google integration, good for teams already in the Google ecosystem. Limited advanced governance and server‑side (requires GTM 360).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · scale prompt · soft negative
“Google Tag Manager (GTM), especially with its server-side (sGTM) capabilities, is the best overall tag management system for most mid-market B2B companies.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
“Google Tag Manager is the dominant TMS globally due to its free tier, intuitive interface, and seamless integration with the Google Marketing Platform” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“The market leader, used by over 99% of sites with a TMS. It's free, easy to use, and integrates seamlessly with Google's ecosystem.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“often recommended to be avoided unless you have a specific need for its advanced features” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise scale means enterprise risk: rules misconfigured in one property can affect hundreds of pages across a global portfolio.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Products such as Adobe or Tealium may be powerful, but their cost and implementation burden can be disproportionate” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best if you're already in the Adobe ecosystem” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“A robust enterprise solution with deep integration into Adobe's marketing cloud... but it comes with a higher cost and complexity.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · alternative
“Tealium and Adobe Launch are the leading enterprise choices when you need advanced governance, security, and dedicated support.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.