Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › GTM › GTM data and infrastructure › Email verification › EmailListVerify vs MyEmailVerifier
Email verification · November 2026 Edition

EmailListVerify vs MyEmailVerifier

Zero of fourteen models named EmailListVerify first on the direct prompt; zero named MyEmailVerifier. EmailListVerify was named by nine of the fourteen models and MyEmailVerifier by ten and EmailListVerify carries 16 labels and MyEmailVerifier 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.

EmailListVerify

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

MyEmailVerifier

criticized challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share7%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate19%27%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1611A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, EmailListVerify reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ZeroBounce was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. ZeroBounce vs EmailListVerify · ZeroBounce vs MyEmailVerifier · DeBounce vs EmailListVerify

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the email verification page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
EmailListVerifyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMyEmailVerifier
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained33
Scale-constrained00
Negative003 against EmailListVerify · 3 against MyEmailVerifier
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, EmailListVerify and MyEmailVerifier were named in the same answer nine times, of the 37 answers naming EmailListVerify and the 23 naming MyEmailVerifier. In those answers MyEmailVerifier took the first choice three times and EmailListVerify zero.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where EmailListVerify and MyEmailVerifier stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
EmailListVerify MyEmailVerifier first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, EmailListVerify on the left and MyEmailVerifier on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where EmailListVerify and MyEmailVerifier stood in it.

Neither was named

14 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniZeroBounce alternatives: Apollo.io, Clearout, Kickbox
Gemini 3.5 FlashZeroBounce alternatives: Bouncer, Kickbox, NeverBounce
Perplexity SonarZeroBounce alternatives: Bouncer, Kickbox, Prospeo
Grok 4.20ZeroBounce alternatives: Bouncer, Emailable, Hunter Email Verifier, NeverBounce
Mistral SmallZeroBounce alternatives: Bouncer, MillionVerifier
DeepSeek V4 FlashZeroBounce alternatives: Bouncer, Kickbox, NeverBounce
Llama 4 MaverickZeroBounce alternatives: Hunter Email Verifier, Mailercloud Email Verifier
Qwen 3.7 FlashZeroBounce alternatives: Bouncer, Kickbox, NeverBounce
Kimi K2ZeroBounce alternatives: Bouncer, Emailable, Kickbox
GLM 4.7 FlashXZeroBounce alternatives: Bouncer, Kickbox
MiniMax M2.5ZeroBounce alternatives: Clearout, Kickbox
GPT-6 LunaZeroBounce alternatives: Kickbox, NeverBounce
Muse Glimmer 30BZeroBounce alternatives: Bouncer, Kickbox, NeverBounce

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
EmailListVerify leads by two points.
EmailListVerify2%#9 of 11
MyEmailVerifier0%#– of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
EmailListVerify7%#4 of 11
MyEmailVerifier7%#5 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
EmailListVerify0%#– of 9
MyEmailVerifier0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about EmailListVerify

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“I would be more cautious using it as the only gatekeeper for outbound campaigns tied closely to domain reputation” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Included in user tests with variable accuracy... Check for your specific email domains.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Email List Verify | Inconsistent results - "clean" emails still bouncing” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most budget-conscious companies, EmailListVerify offers the absolute lowest cost per verified email” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“EmailListVerify is the best starting point for occasional or bulk list cleaning” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“Emailable or EmailListVerify stand out as the best options” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about MyEmailVerifier

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Multiple Trustpilot complaints label it as unreliable or "fake"—it often misclassifies valid emails as invalid” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“They are liars... their verification process is fake.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Some users claim the verification process is inaccurate” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best email verification service for a company with a limited budget is MyEmailVerifier, as it offers the most affordable pricing at $0.0025 per verification” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“MyEmailVerifier is the most affordable email verification service in 2026, at $0.0025 per verification; the lowest rate in the industry.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Most budget‑conscious: MyEmailVerifier” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
ZeroBounce vs EmailListVerifyZeroBounce vs MyEmailVerifierDeBounce vs EmailListVerifyDeBounce vs MyEmailVerifierBouncer vs EmailListVerifyBouncer vs MyEmailVerifierEmailListVerify vs EmailableEmailListVerify vs NeverBounceEmailListVerify vs ClearoutMyEmailVerifier vs EmailableMyEmailVerifier vs NeverBounceMyEmailVerifier vs ClearoutAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full email verification standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.